Objectionable websites, accounts blocked, PTA tells PHC
This was stated by PTA lawyer, Jehanzeb Mehsud, who appeared before a two-member PHC bench consisting of Justice SM Attique Shah and Justice Syed Arshad Ali
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) was informed on Thursday that the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) had blocked over 111,9000 objectionable websites and social media accounts in the country so far.
This was stated by the PTA lawyer, Jehanzeb Mehsud, who appeared before a two-member PHC bench consisting of Justice SM Attique Shah and Justice Syed Arshad Ali.
When the court started the hearing, the petitioner, Sara Ali Khan, said contents were available on the social media platforms such as facebook, X (formerly Twitter) and Instagram, etc, which was affecting our social values.
She said these contents were against our faith, religion and thus negatively affecting the young generation. The petitioner said the PTA had no mechanism to block such sites.
The petitioner sought the court directives to the PTA to block such sites and accounts permanently and introduce a filter that stops uploading of these contents.
The PTA lawyer submitted to the court that the websites that the petitioner had mentioned in the petition had already been blocked by the authority.
He said over 111,0000 contents had been removed but blocking them permanently was not possible as those interested in such contents accessed them by using the VPN.
The lawyer said the PTA had no such mechanism to filter such contents before uploading but efforts were being made as far as possible curb the practice.
Justice SM Attique Shah asked the PTA lawyer if there was any filtration mechanism, he said the contents could be deleted after uploading. We are deleting thousands of such contents on daily basis, he informed the court. The petitioner requested the court to put the Federal Investigation Agency on notice because the objectionable contents were present on networking websites. The court disposed of the case after hearing arguments from both sides. A detailed verdict would be released later.
-
Anti-monarchy Group Reacts To Prince William, Kate Middleton Statement On Epstein Scandal -
Andrew 'must' Apologize Not Wider Royal Family For Jeffrey Epstein Links -
Super Bowl 2026: Why Didn't Epstein Survivors Ad Air On TV? -
'Harry Potter' TV Series Exec Teases 'biggest Event In Streaming': Deets -
Camila Mendes Finally Reveals Wedding Plans With Fiancé Rudy Mancuso -
Beatrice, Eugenie Blindsided By Extent Of Sarah Ferguson’s Epstein Links -
Girl And Grandfather Attacked In Knife Assault Outside Los Angeles Home -
Super Bowl Halftime Show 2026: What Did Trump Say About Bad Bunny? -
Piers Morgan Defends Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Performance, Disagrees With Trump Remarks -
Andrew Lands In New Trouble Days After Royal Lodge Eviction -
Instagram, YouTube Addiction Case Trial Kicks Off In California -
Agentic Engineering: Next Big AI Trend After Vibe Coding In 2026 -
Keke Palmer Makes Jaw-dropping Confession About 'The Burbs' -
Cher Sparks Major Health Concerns As She Pushes Herself To Limit At 79 -
Former NYPD Detective Says Nancy Guthrie's Disappearance 'could Be Hoax' -
King Charles Publicly Asked If He Knew About Andrew's Connection To Epstein