NA secretariat notifies law curtailing CJP’s powers
National Assembly Secretariat notified the “Supreme Court Practice and Procedure Bill 2023” as an act of parliament curtailing CJP's suo motu powers
ISLAMABAD: The National Assembly Secretariat Friday notified the “Supreme Court Practice and Procedure Bill 2023” as an act of parliament curtailing the suo motu powers of chief justice of Pakistan.
The bill — passed by a joint sitting of parliament on April 10 — was returned unsigned by President Alvi on Thursday.
An eight-member bench of the Supreme Court, however, halted the bill’s implementation.
The notification says the bill is deemed to have been given assent by the president under Article 75(2) of the Constitution and has been published in the Gazette of Pakistan.
Earlier, the bill approved by the federal cabinet on March 28 and then passed by both the houses of the parliament was sent to the president but it came back unsigned.
The president observed that the bill travelled beyond the competence of parliament. The bill proposes that every case, appeal or matter before the Supreme Court, shall be heard and disposed of by a bench constituted by a committee comprising the chief justice of Pakistan and two senior-most judges in order of seniority.
It further states any matter invoking the exercise of original jurisdiction under Clause (3) of Article 184 of the Constitution shall be first placed before the committee for examination and if the committee is of the view that a question of public importance with reference to enforcement of any of the fundamental rights is involved, then it shall constitute a bench comprising not less than three judges of the apex court, which may also include the members of the committee for adjudication of the matter.
The Bill recommends that an appeal shall lie within 30 days from the final order of a bench of the Supreme Court that exercised jurisdiction to the larger bench of the apex court and such appeal shall for hearing be fixed within a period not exceeding fourteen days.
Furthermore, it grants a party the right to appoint a counsel of its choice for filing a review application.
The right of appeal shall also be available to any aggrieved party against whom an order had been passed under Article 184(3) before commencement of the Supreme Court Practice and Procedure Act, 2023.
-
William’s Thoughts About Prince Harry Take Turn For The Worse: ‘Really Thought His Judgement Was Better’ -
Dolly Parton Ready To Marry Again After Dean's First Death Anniversary? -
China Exports Surge In Early 2026, Smashing Forecasts By Defying Trump’s Tariff Pressure -
Why Lewis Hamilton Believes Kim Kardashian Is His 'dream Girl' -
Massive 600-kg NASA Satellite To Hit Earth Today: Could Humans Be At Risk? -
Anthropic Fears Pentagon Blacklist Could Wipe Out Billions In Potential Sales: Here’s Why -
Meghan Markle, Harry’s Humanitarian Trip Falls Flat For William: ‘He Can’t Wait To Put A Stop To It’ -
Gwen Stefani Makes Unexpected Confession Linked To Pregnancy At 43 -
Pentagon Signals End Of Anthropic AI Deal Following Trump Administration Legal Clash -
Luke Grimes Reveals How Love Story With Bianca Rodrigues Began -
Saskatoon Fire Under University Bridge Damages Sewer Line Again As Crews Respond -
'Heated Rivalry' Star Hudson Williams Claps Back At Toxic Fans -
Ukrainian Biathlete Credits ChatGPT For Paralympic Medal– Can AI Replace Coaches? -
Sarah Ferguson Pushes Beatrice, Eugenie To The Edge? Insider Reveals Demands From Struggling Sisters -
Trump Threatens Devastating Retaliation Against Iran Over Oil Trade: What Does The Strait Of Hormuz Standoff Mean For Worried Americans? -
Multivitamin Could Slow Biological Clock And Ageing Process, New Study Shows