SC ends ban on protest by govt employees, labour unions
Suspends BHC order stating high court crossed its jurisdiction
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court (SC) on Monday suspended the Balochistan High Court (BHC) order and removed the ban on protests by government employees and labour unions.
The court ruled that launching protests and giving calls for protest was the fundamental right of government employees and trade unions.A three-member bench of the apex court, headed by Justice Gulzar Ahmed, while hearing the appeal filed by the Balochistan Government Teachers Association, ruled that launching a protest was the fundamental right of every employee.
Habibur Rehman Mardanzai, General Secretary, Balochistan Government Teachers Association, had filed an appeal in the Supreme Court (SC) against the order of the Balochistan High Court passed on December 9, banning the protests of government employees and labour unions.
Appearing on notice, Asma Jehangir, the counsel for petitioners, informed the court that the BHC had banned the protest of labour unions of government organisations on December 9.She submitted that the learned BHC had ruled in its order that if any government employee protested, the chief secretary was required to take action against the employee by filing a treason case against the protester.
The learned counsel further informed the court that in its order, the learned BHC had also ruled if the chief secretary failed to take action against the protesters, he would be proceeded against.Asma Jehangir further contended that government teachers of the province had peacefully observed a hunger strike without ransacking property or causing any loss.
Meanwhile, the court, after hearing the arguments of the learned counsel, ruled that the learned BHC in its ruling had crossed its jurisdiction.The court further ruled that launching a protest or giving a call for protest and forming labour unions was the fundamental right of government employees. The SC suspended the order of BHC and issued notices to the parties concerned and adjourned the hearing for date-in-office.
-
Matthew McConaughey Says THIS Got Him Involved In WWE-style Wrestling Fight In Small African Village -
Pierce Brosnan Gets Honest About Impact Of Growing Older On Career -
WhatsApp May Soon Let Users Set Profile Cover Photos -
Michael B. Jordan Makes Emotional Remarks About 'Sinners' -
US 'Doomsday Plane' Lands At LAX For The First Time In Its 51-year History -
Royal Fans React As Kate Middleton Receives Rare Honor On 44th Birthday -
Amy Madigan Opens Up About 'Weapons' Prequel: 'That's A Problem' -
Tom Blyth Based 'People We Meet On Vacation' Role On THIS '80s Romcom Lead -
England Midfielder Stanway To Leave Bayern Munich This Summer -
Princess Diana's Brother Sends Out Invitations Days After Royal Family Snubbed Prince Harry -
Kanye West Makes Legal Move Against Rival Lawyers -
Android May Soon Let Users Test Paid Games Before Buying -
2026 Global Health Outlook: Experts Warn Of Key Challenges Ahead -
Grok App Hits No.1 In The UK App Store Amid Government Threat Of Platform Ban -
Andrew Receives New Orders From King Charles As Former Duke Likely To Follow Prince Harry's Footsteps -
'Hunger Games' Update: Jennifer Lawrence Returns To The Franchise