SC ends ban on protest by govt employees, labour unions
Suspends BHC order stating high court crossed its jurisdiction
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court (SC) on Monday suspended the Balochistan High Court (BHC) order and removed the ban on protests by government employees and labour unions.
The court ruled that launching protests and giving calls for protest was the fundamental right of government employees and trade unions.A three-member bench of the apex court, headed by Justice Gulzar Ahmed, while hearing the appeal filed by the Balochistan Government Teachers Association, ruled that launching a protest was the fundamental right of every employee.
Habibur Rehman Mardanzai, General Secretary, Balochistan Government Teachers Association, had filed an appeal in the Supreme Court (SC) against the order of the Balochistan High Court passed on December 9, banning the protests of government employees and labour unions.
Appearing on notice, Asma Jehangir, the counsel for petitioners, informed the court that the BHC had banned the protest of labour unions of government organisations on December 9.She submitted that the learned BHC had ruled in its order that if any government employee protested, the chief secretary was required to take action against the employee by filing a treason case against the protester.
The learned counsel further informed the court that in its order, the learned BHC had also ruled if the chief secretary failed to take action against the protesters, he would be proceeded against.Asma Jehangir further contended that government teachers of the province had peacefully observed a hunger strike without ransacking property or causing any loss.
Meanwhile, the court, after hearing the arguments of the learned counsel, ruled that the learned BHC in its ruling had crossed its jurisdiction.The court further ruled that launching a protest or giving a call for protest and forming labour unions was the fundamental right of government employees. The SC suspended the order of BHC and issued notices to the parties concerned and adjourned the hearing for date-in-office.
-
Nobel Foundation Reaffirms Its Core Responsibility To ‘safeguard The Dignity Of The Nobel Prizes’ -
Prince William, Kate Middleton Warned Of Meghan Markle’s UK Return -
Melissa Leo Reveals How Winning An Oscar Made Things Worse -
Piers Morgan In Hospital: Here's Why -
IPhone 18 Pro Leaked: New Design Reveals Radical Corner Camera Layout -
Kung Fu Legend Siu-Lung Leung Passes Away At 77 -
Kim Kardashian To Remove Ex Kanye West From Her Kids' Names -
Queens Mother Arrested After Abducting Child From Court-ordered Visit -
Sarah Ferguson Ready To ‘spread Her Wings’ After Separating From ‘disgraced’ Andrew -
Finn Wolfhard Shares How Industry Views Him Post 'Stranger Things' -
Dylan O'Brien Gets Nostalgic After Reunion With Old Friend -
UK Doctors Warn Screen Time Is Harming Children’s Health -
Meghan Markle To Get Police Protection In UK If Travelling With Archie, Lilibet -
Spencer Pratt Expresses Hope For Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce's Wedding Invite -
Evan Peters Makes Unexpected Confession About 'American Horror Story' Season 13 -
Kentucky Grandmother Arrested After Toddlers With Broken Skulls, Ribs