SHC declares withholding income tax on judicial allowance ‘unlawful’
KARACHI: The Sindh High Court on Friday held that amount of judicial allowance and special judicial allowance paid to the members of SHC as well and that of sub-ordinate judiciary was not part of their taxable salary income, hence, not chargeable as tax deduction.
Allowing petitions of the high court employees against deduction of income tax on judicial allowance and special judicial allowance, the SHC’s division bench headed by Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi ordered that withholding of income tax on the judicial and special judicial allowance is illegal and without lawful authority. The court directed income tax department not to withhold any amount of income tax from judicial allowance and special judicial allowance of the members of SHC and those of the sub-ordinate judiciary.
It ordered that amount already deducted from their salaries be refunded by the Federal Board of Revenue on their filing refund applications within three months from the date of such claims. The court observed that government's counsel has not been able to assist court as to how the judicial allowance and special judicial allowance does not fall within the category of the allowances covered within the exclusion of section 12(2) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.
The court observed that respondent counsel was asked when both the allowances are not deducted as taxes by the Punjab and Khyder Pakhtoonkhwa governments and the Federal Board of Revenue, why such a discriminatory attitude is being resorted to by Accountant General of Sindh or the Federal Board of Revenue in the case of SHC and subordinate judiciary in the Sindh. However, the respondent's counsel could not explanation on behalf of the federal and provincial governments.
The petitioners had submitted that deduction of income tax on the judicial allowance and special judicial allowance from their salaries at source under section 149 of the income tax Ordinance, 2001, by the Accountant General Sindh is unlawful and requested the court to declare it illegal and without lawful authority.
The federal government counsel opposed the petitions and submitted that every income is chargeable to tax unless exempted.
-
Dolly Parton Marks Major Milestone As State Governor Honors Her Legacy -
Karley Scott Collins Reacts To Rumours Of Her Dating Keith Urban -
Meghan Markle Sends Shockwaves With Promise Of Chaos: ‘Has The Power To Upset The Royals’ -
Jesy Nelson, Zion Foster Call It Quits Amid Twins' Heartbreaking Diagnosis: Source -
What King Charles Told Princess Diana In Letter Before Wedding? -
David Crosby Said This One Singer Had 'no Talent At All' -
Meghan Markle’s Return Risks Setting Off Something ‘exhausting’ And William, Kate Are Bracing -
Bruce Springsteen Reveals Singer He Finds To Be Greatest Rock And Roll Voice -
Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Ensures Teddy Bear Collection Reaches New Home -
Ben Affleck Recalls 'throwing Up' During 'Armageddon's Final Scene -
Kevin Costner Marks 71st Birthday With Decades-old Throwback Photos -
Why Royal Lodge Fell Into Disarray Under Andrew: Insider Exposes Loophole -
Hoda Kotb 'so Proud' As Today 'magic Reignites' With Sheinelle Jones -
Kate Middleton Avoids Nanny Involvmenet In Prince George Matters -
Colin Jost Jokes About Scarlett Johansson Losing Highest-grossing Actor Crown To Zoe Saldana -
‘Traitor’ Prince Harry Has ‘spooked’ His Family: ‘He Has To Pay A Price Of Re-entry’