Court moved against indirect LG election
LAHOREA writ petition has been moved in Lahore High Court challenging indirect election on the seats of women, workers, youth members and non-Muslims in local government election. Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT) has filed petition through advocate Ishtiaq A Khan assailing different provisions of Punjab Local Government Ordinance 2015 PAT Punjab
By our correspondents
August 12, 2015
LAHORE
A writ petition has been moved in Lahore High Court challenging indirect election on the seats of women, workers, youth members and non-Muslims in local government election. Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT) has filed petition through advocate Ishtiaq A Khan assailing different provisions of Punjab Local Government Ordinance 2015
PAT Punjab President Basharat Aziz Jaspal filed a petition and stated that sections 2, 4 and 8 of the PLGO are repugnant to the Article 140-A, 25, and 17 of the Constitution. He said the impugned sections curtailed rights of the public at large especially their right to democratic and efficient governance. He said the ordinance smacks malafide on part of the Punjab government to deny the representation of women, workers and youth members through direct election. The petitioner pleaded that indirect election (section) would pave the way for corruption as elected members are likely to be purchased as means of commodity. He said denial of direct representation to the women, youth, workers, and non-Muslims was negation of Article 25 of the Constitution, which prohibits discrimination.
A writ petition has been moved in Lahore High Court challenging indirect election on the seats of women, workers, youth members and non-Muslims in local government election. Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT) has filed petition through advocate Ishtiaq A Khan assailing different provisions of Punjab Local Government Ordinance 2015
PAT Punjab President Basharat Aziz Jaspal filed a petition and stated that sections 2, 4 and 8 of the PLGO are repugnant to the Article 140-A, 25, and 17 of the Constitution. He said the impugned sections curtailed rights of the public at large especially their right to democratic and efficient governance. He said the ordinance smacks malafide on part of the Punjab government to deny the representation of women, workers and youth members through direct election. The petitioner pleaded that indirect election (section) would pave the way for corruption as elected members are likely to be purchased as means of commodity. He said denial of direct representation to the women, youth, workers, and non-Muslims was negation of Article 25 of the Constitution, which prohibits discrimination.
-
Sydney Sweeney Falsely Linked To Ottawa Senators' Brady Tkachuk -
Astronaut Ron Garan Reveals Earth’s ‘Big Lie’ Discovered From Orbit -
Meghan Markle And Prince Harry's Netflix Deal Is 'under Pressure': Here's Why -
How Did Lou Holtz Die? -
China Raises Defence Spending 7% As Modernisation Drive Intensifies By 2035 -
Real Reason Why Bethenny Frankel Refused To Join 'Real Housewives' Reboot Series -
Is Gen Z Becoming The Most Conservative Generation? ‘Progressive Paradox’ Explained -
Lindsay Lohan's 'scary' Decision Amid War Worries Her Inner Circle -
Nebraska Sues Roblox Over Child Safety Failures -
Amanda Holden Finds The Bright Side With Nostalgic Move Amid ‘Britain’s Got Talent’ Crisis Rumors -
Strait Of Hormuz Turmoil: Gulf Shipping Crisis Raises Fears Of Global Food Price Shock -
Sarah J Maas Makes Exciting Announcement For ‘Acotar’ Series -
Teyana Taylor Makes Shocking Claim About 'One Battle After Another': 'Very, Very Real' -
Qatar Airways To Operate Relief Flights From Muscat And Riyadh For Stranded Travelers Amid Global Turmoil -
2026 Pro-Human AI Declaration: How Humanity Can Control Artificial Intelligence -
Lewis Hamilton Vows To 'put More Work In' As He Gears To Return For 2026 Formula 1 Season