PHC declares Conservancy Tax by cantonment boards illegal
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) has ruled that Conservancy Tax imposed by the Cantonment Boards on shopkeepers and owners of commercial plazas in cantonment areas is illegal and directed the authorities to refund the money collected so far. A division bench comprising Justice Yahya Afridi and Justice Irshad Qaisar
By Akhtar Amin
July 31, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) has ruled that Conservancy Tax imposed by the Cantonment Boards on shopkeepers and owners of commercial plazas in cantonment areas is illegal and directed the authorities to refund the money collected so far.
A division bench comprising Justice Yahya Afridi and Justice Irshad Qaisar announced the verdict, which was reserved a week ago. The shopkeepers of Cantonment Board Peshawar had filed the writ petition.
During hearing of the case, the petitioner’s lawyer Farman Ali Khattak submitted that the Cantonment Board authorities had imposed the Conservancy Tax on shopkeepers and owners of commercial plazas in 2013 in the cantonment areas.
He pointed out that the authorities were collecting the tax ranging from Rs500 to Rs800 with the claim that it was paid to cantonment employees for cleaning the areas and removing waste in front of the shops and shopping plazas.
The lawyer said that first there was no provision in the Cantonment Board Act 1924 to impose Conservancy Tax and second the petitioners or the owners of commercial plazas were paying the property tax to the Cantonment Board. He requested the bench to declare the tax as void and order recovery of the collected money in this respect.
However, the lawyer for the containment board could not defend the imposition of the tax. After hearing arguments, the court declared the Conservancy Tax illegal and ordered authorities to refund the collected money.
Ex-minister’s case left over: Separately, the writ petition of the PTI’s former provincial minister for mines and minerals Ziaullah Afridi was left over by another bench of the high court comprising of Justice Irshad Qaisar and Justice Roohul Amin due to shortage of time.
The high court would announce a date for hearing the case, in which the former minister had challenged his arrest by the Ehtesab Commission KP. Hidayatullah Afridi, had challenged the arrest in the high court through his lawyers Abdul Latif Afridi and Muazzam Butt.
A division bench comprising Justice Yahya Afridi and Justice Irshad Qaisar announced the verdict, which was reserved a week ago. The shopkeepers of Cantonment Board Peshawar had filed the writ petition.
During hearing of the case, the petitioner’s lawyer Farman Ali Khattak submitted that the Cantonment Board authorities had imposed the Conservancy Tax on shopkeepers and owners of commercial plazas in 2013 in the cantonment areas.
He pointed out that the authorities were collecting the tax ranging from Rs500 to Rs800 with the claim that it was paid to cantonment employees for cleaning the areas and removing waste in front of the shops and shopping plazas.
The lawyer said that first there was no provision in the Cantonment Board Act 1924 to impose Conservancy Tax and second the petitioners or the owners of commercial plazas were paying the property tax to the Cantonment Board. He requested the bench to declare the tax as void and order recovery of the collected money in this respect.
However, the lawyer for the containment board could not defend the imposition of the tax. After hearing arguments, the court declared the Conservancy Tax illegal and ordered authorities to refund the collected money.
Ex-minister’s case left over: Separately, the writ petition of the PTI’s former provincial minister for mines and minerals Ziaullah Afridi was left over by another bench of the high court comprising of Justice Irshad Qaisar and Justice Roohul Amin due to shortage of time.
The high court would announce a date for hearing the case, in which the former minister had challenged his arrest by the Ehtesab Commission KP. Hidayatullah Afridi, had challenged the arrest in the high court through his lawyers Abdul Latif Afridi and Muazzam Butt.
-
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Throws King Charles A Diplomatic Crisis -
Barack Obama Hails Seahawks Super Bowl Win, Calls Defense ‘special’ -
Pregnant Women With Depression Likely To Have Kids With Autism -
$44B Sent By Mistake: South Korea Demands Tougher Crypto Regulations -
Lady Gaga Makes Surprising Cameo During Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Performance -
Paul Brothers Clash Over Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Performance -
South Korea: Two Killed As Military Helicopter Crashes During Training -
Elon Musk Unveils SpaceX’s Moon-first Strategy With ‘self Growing Lunar City’ -
Donald Trump Slams Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Performance: 'Absolutely Terrible' -
Jake Paul Criticizes Bad Bunny's Super Bowl LX Halftime Show: 'Fake American' -
Prince William Wants Uncle Andrew In Front Of Police: What To Expect Of Future King -
Antioxidants Found To Be Protective Agents Against Cognitive Decline -
Hong Kong Court Sentences Media Tycoon Jimmy Lai To 20-years: Full List Of Charges Explained -
Coffee Reduces Cancer Risk, Research Suggests -
Katie Price Defends Marriage To Lee Andrews After Receiving Multiple Warnings -
Seahawks Super Bowl Victory Parade 2026: Schedule, Route & Seattle Celebration Plans