SHC seeks govt’s comments on petition against universities law
The Sindh High Court on Thursday directed a provincial law officer, the Sindh Assembly speaker and others to file comments on a petition against a controversial law passed last year which granted the chief minister broad control over the province’s public sector universities.
Altaf Shakoor, the president of Pasban, a political group, submitted in his petition that the Sindh Assembly had passed the controversial Sindh Universities and Institutes Laws (Amendment) Act 2018 which placed all the administrative powers of the public sector varsities of Sindh with the CM, taking them away from the governor, who was a representative and symbol of the federation in the province.
The petitioner submitted that 24 public sector universities had been affected due to the law across Sindh as political and bureaucratic interference had been inducted and injected into them, which darkened the future of their students.
Shakoor submitted that the ruling political party in Sindh – the Pakistan Peoples Party – unlawfully passed the impugned amendments with an incomplete quorum and without fulfilling the lawful and constitutional formalities.
He further said that the law had changed the functions undertaken by the academic councils such as formulating admission policies. Moreover, under the law, the vice chancellors (VCs) could not take administrative decisions to run the day-to-day affairs of the varsities as despite the completion of universities’ syndicates, even appointments made by the VCs would be subject to the approval of the CM. All university teachers and staff were against the impugned law and had rejected it, the petitioner claimed.
According to the petitioner, the intention, aims and objectives of the legislature should always be bona fide and in the welfare and interests of the general public and the legislature should not hurt the interests of the people by imposing an unwanted and illegal law.
Shakoor stated in the petition that the controversial law had snatched the autonomy earlier enjoyed by the institutions of higher education and inducted a majority of provincial bureaucrats in the varsities’ bodies.
The provincial law officer sought time from the SHC to file comments on the petition. A division bench of the high court, headed by Justice Mohammad Ali Mazhar, directed the officer to respond to the petition by October 15.
-
Peter Jackson Reveals A Viggo Mortensen Mishap In 'LOTR' Fans Totally Missed -
Marsh Farm: Work Underway On Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's New Home -
'Rip' Director Dishes On Matt Damon, Ben Affleck's ‘brotherly’ Dynamic -
Meghan Markle Handed Strict Warning: ‘You’re Playing With Fire In A High Risk, High Noise’ Game’ -
Paul McCartney Reveals How Close He Came To Giving Up Music -
Kate Middleton’s Secret Message Decoded: ‘She’s Done With All This!’ -
Police Uncover Secret Cannabis Empire Ran By New York Woman -
'Euphoria' Season Three Trailer Shows Chaotic Life After High School -
Marisa Abela Opens Up About Impact Of Cancer Treatment On Lifestyle -
Kensington Palace Shares Video Of Windsor Castle Ceremony -
Prince Harry’s Future Inheritance Causes Fears: ‘William Doesn’t Want To Support Meghan’s Ambitions’ -
Gabrielle Union, 53, Delights Fans With Bold Photos -
World's Biggest Fish Market Is Set To Open In Sydney: First Look Revealed -
Ariana Grande, Jonathan Bailey Reuniting For THIS Project -
Sydney Sweeney Saved Herself From Brutal Roast: Here's How -
Prince Harry’s ‘unrealistic’ Hopes Get Dashed: ‘Sincerity For King Charles Is Under Question’