Weapons of war
Nuclear weapons present the greatest public health and existential threat to our survival every moment of every day. Yet the United States and world nuclear nations stand in breach of the 1968 Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty which commits these nations to work in good faith to end the arms race and to achieve nuclear disarmament. Forty eight years later the efforts of the nuclear nations toward this goal is not evident and the state of the world is equally as dangerous as it was during the height of the Cold War and arguably more dangerous with current scientific evidence on the catastrophic effects of even limited regional nuclear war.
This year’s presidential campaign has once again done little to focus on the dangers of nuclear weapons focusing more on who has the temperament to have their finger on the button with absolutely no indication of any understanding of the consequences to all of humanity by the use of these weapons even on a very small scale. In addition to tensions between Russia and the US in Ukraine and Syria, there is a real danger of nuclear war in South Asia which could kill more than 2 billion people from the use of just 100 Hiroshima size weapons.
The rest of the world is finally standing up to this threat to their survival and that of the planet. They are taking matters into their own hands and refusing to be held hostage by the nuclear nations. They will no longer be bullied into sitting back and waiting for the nuclear states to make good on empty promises.
At the United Nations this past week, 123 nations voted to commence negotiations next year on a new treaty to prohibit the possession of nuclear weapons. Despite President Obama’s own words in his 2009 pledge to seek the security of a world free of nuclear weapons, the US voted ‘no’and led the opposition to this treaty.
Rather than meet our obligations under international law, the US has proposed by stark contrast to begin a new nuclear arms race spending $1 trillion dollars over the next 30 years to modernize and rebuild every aspect our nuclear weapons programs. A ‘jobs’ program to end humanity. Each of the nuclear nations is expected to do the same in rebuilding their weapons programs continuing the arms race for generations to come.
The myth of deterrence is the guise for this effort when in fact deterrence is the principle driver of the arms race. For every additional weapon my adversary has, I need two and so on and so on to our global arsenals of 15,500 weapons.
Fed up with this inaction and doublespeak, the non-nuclear nations of the world have joined the ongoing efforts of the world’s NGO, health and religious communities in demanding an end to the madness. Led by the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), a global partnership of 440 partners in 98 countries, the International Red Cross, the world’s health associations representing more than 17 million health professionals worldwide along with religious communities including the Catholic Church and World Council of Churches they are calling for a treaty to ban and eliminate nuclear weapons.
The effort to ban nuclear weapons has several parallels to the International Campaign to Ban Landmines led by Jody Williams, recipient of the 1997 Nobel Peace Prize. This effort was dismissed and called utopian by most governments and militaries of the world when it was launched by nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in 1992 only to succeed in 1997 through partnerships, public imagination and political pressure resulting in the ultimate political will. The nuclear ban movement has been vigorously fought by the nuclear nations trying desperately to hold onto their weapons and pressuring members of their alliances to hold the line.
As with any public health threat from Zika, to Ebola, Polio, HIV, prevention is the goal. The global threat from nuclear weapons is no different. The only way to prevent the use of nuclear weapons is to ban and eliminate them.
President Kennedy speaking on nuclear weapons before the UN Security Council in September 1961 said, “The weapons of war must be abolished before they abolish us”. Our children’s children will look back and rightly ask why we the only nation to ever use nuclear weapons remained on the wrong side of history when it came to abolishing nuclear weapons.
The article has been excerpted from: ‘Nuclear Weapons – The Time for Abolition is Now’.
Courtesy: Commondreams.org
-
AI Rivalry: Anthropic Investors Push To De-escalate Pentagon Clash Over AI Safeguards, Sources Say -
Jamie Lee Curtis Doubles Down On Her Assertion About 'The Bear's Imminent End -
Nicole Kidman Reacts To Daughters' Possible Future In Hollywood -
Harry Styles Weighs In On The Origins Of His Muse While Talking About 'Carla’s Song' From Upcoming Album -
Alarming: New Research Suggests Global Sea Levels Have Been Underestimated Due To Flawed Modelling -
Meghan Markle Elated As ‘As Ever’ Proves To Be ‘double Edged Sword’ -
Gulf Shipping Crisis Deepens Amid Geopolitical Tensions: Can Global Powers Manage Oil Supply Shortfall? -
Nicole Kidman Suffers From An Alarming Condition As She Experiences Emotional Fallout Amid Keith Urban Split -
Tom Brady's Friends Warn Him About Alix Earle's Real Intentions Following Romance Rumors -
Khloe Kardashian Shares Update On ‘Daddy’ Back Tattoo Removal -
Fortnite Returns To Google Play Worldwide After Google, Epic Games Settle Dispute -
Demi Lovato Reflects On Being Compared To Miley Cyrus, Selena Gomez During Disney Days -
Prince William Envision More ‘accountability’ When He Makes King -
Brad Pitt Eager To Win Fight Over Daughter Shiloh As His War Against Angelina Jolie's Influence On Kids Continues -
Teddi Mellencamp Shares Worrisome Update Amid Stage 4 Cancer Battle: 'I Thought I Had Flu' -
US, UK Split On Crypto Collaboration: Can Bitcoin Help Secure A New Deal?