Illegal judicial appointments
The Supreme Court of Pakistan has made a bold decision to take to clean up its own house following a ruling given on a case on staff appointments made in the Islamabad High Court. The SC ruling bases itself on the logic that the judicial set up cannot think of itself as higher than the formal processes it is required to follow. The image of the judiciary was at stake in the said case. The judgment references the ‘abuse of authority’ by court officials and ‘denial of justice’ to candidates. The fresh recruitment will now take place within 45 days. The directives will not apply to lower level staff appointments up till the BS-07 posts as long as the appointees possess the basic eligibility requirements. Many of the illegal appointees will be returned to their parent departments.
The higher judiciary has granted justice to the petitioner against its own institution. This is a lesson that must be learnt by other key institutions in the country. The SC has taken an important step in improving transparency in appointments by sharing the details of the individual cases and the types of violations that took place. The only thing missing is a directive to investigate and pin the responsibility for the illegal appointments. If illegal appointments were indeed made, someone should be held accountable for doing so. The judiciary has shown itself to be the torchbearer of justice. The SC has made a difficult but important decision that will be received unfavourably within certain judicial circles. This is what makes the decision even more important. The SC decision can only be appreciated. It is hoped that others follow the example set by the highest court in the country.
Haider Rashid
Lahore
-
Andrew’s Eviction Marks: ‘the End Of Grifting’: ‘It A Catastrophic Fall From Grace’ -
ASAP Rocky Disses Rihanna's Ex Drake In New Track -
Jennifer Aniston, Jim Curtis Face One Major Hurdle In Their Union -
Restaurant Workers Detained After ICE Agents Dine At Minnesota Eatery -
Kate Middleton Reveals Sport She Would Not Play With Prince George -
First Poll Since King Charles' Action Against Andrew Reveals Royal Family's Public Standing -
Blake Lively Strengthens Legal Team Ahead Of Justin Baldoni Trial -
'Back To School!': Palace Shares Details Of Princess Anne's Latest Engagements -
Paul Mescal Clarifies Acting Break Comment As He Teases Paul McCartney Role -
Kate Middleton's Unexpected Style Of Arrival At Solo Outing Goes Viral -
Why ‘X’ Is Down? Thousands Report Twitter Outage: Here’s What You Can Do -
Florida Man Held After Alleged Nail-scattering On Busy Intersections -
Valeria Nicov: Sean Penn's Athletic Girlfriend Raises Eyebrows With Latest Photos -
Sharon Stone Lashes Out At Fellow Award Show Attendees After Stealing Accusations -
Gwyneth Paltrow Reveals Real Reason She Said Yes To 'Marty Supreme' -
King Charles Says He And Queen Camilla Stand With People Of Ukraine