IHC rejects plea to suspend ECP notice against PM Imran Khan
ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Friday rejected Prime Minister Imran Khan and Minister for Planning, Development, and Special Initiatives Asad Umar's pleas to suspend the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) notice against them today for taking part in a rally related to the local bodies polls in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
The ECP had on Marchofficeholders from taking part in election rallies and campaigns. At this, Justice Farooq remarked that the government was bypassing the Parliament and taking support of ordinances to get things done. "With due respect, you (government) have established an ordinance factory; the work of Parliament is being done through ordinances," the judge said. The IHC judge said the Constitution's Article 218 has authorised the ECP to conduct free and fair elections. "And the election commission has given its reference [in their order]."
The judge wondered whether constitutional rights could be revoked by introducing various laws. "The Constitution has given a mandate, which cannot be overruled through an act of the Parliament." Justice Farooq said that his clients should have appeared before the commission on March 14 as it had summoned them over the violation of election rules — and also warned them of action.
Responding to the judge, Barrister Zafar said the Election Commission did not have the authority to issue a notice to his clients and requested the IHC to suspend the ECP's notice and stop it from taking further action. At this, the judge asked whether the Barrister was eligible to decide what was right and wrong. "You should have appeared before the commission. Your conduct was fallacious."
The judge said that if his clients cannot appear before the commission, he, as their lawyer, should appear before the electoral body.
Adjourning the hearing till March 28, the judge said the court was not suspending the ECP's notice to PM Imran Khan and Asad Umar. The IHC issued a notice to the ECP and said it wanted to hear the electoral body's argument as well.
-
‘Traitor’ Prince Harry Has ‘spooked’ His Family: ‘He Has To Pay A Price Of Re-entry’ -
Andrew’s Daughter Princess Eugenie Sparks Seismic Change After Stepping Away -
Meghan Markle Shares NEW Photos From Day Out At The Zoo -
'Game Of Thrones' New Series Returns To 'home' -
Prince Harry Touches Down In Heathrow For The Witness Box -
Harry’s Turmoil Turns To Agony Over Meghan Markle’s Hope: ‘Time Will Tell If He’ll Bare It’ -
Reese Witherspoon Jokes About Jennifer Garner’s 'dark Side' -
'Lion King' Co-director Roger Allers Breathes His Last At 76 -
Prince Harry’s Security ‘isn’t Just For His Family’: Expert Rewires Security Woe -
Prince Harry Risks Making King Charles Choose Between Queen Camilla And Military Duty -
Inside How Kate Middleton Stayed Steady Amid Cancer And Royal Chaos -
Kate Hudson Jokes She May Write A Script To Star Alongside This Actress -
Kanye West's Wife Bianca Censori Shows Off Hidden Talent -
Kate Middleton Has Learnt Her 'lesson' After 'powering Through' -
Will Prince Harry Be A Working Royal Again For Archie, Lilibet’s Royal Prospects? Expert Answers -
Chile In Danger: Deadly Wildfires Kill 20,forced 50,000 To Flee; President Declares ‘State Of Catastrophe’