Modi’s Kashmir statehood assurance ‘vague’: Qureshi
By News Desk
ISLAMABAD: Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi on Friday said as Kashmiris want the full-fledged restoration of occupied Jammu and Kashmir’s statehood, the claim of Indian prime minister Narendra Modi to fulfill such a demand “at some opportune time” was entirely “vague and against the interest of Kashmiris”.
He termed the meeting between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi with Kashmiri leaders while leaving out the All Parties Hurriyat Conference a “staged drama and a public relations exercise” to cover up the illegal acts of August 5, 2019. “This was a failed attempt on part of the Indian prime minister to mend the tarnished image of his government following the illegal acts of revocation of special status of Jammu and Kashmir,” the foreign minister said here at a news conference which touched upon a wide range of topics.
The foreign minister was referring to Thursday’s meeting where Modi met political figures from occupied Jammu and Kashmir — the first high-level engagement since August 2019 when India revoked the region’s autonomy by scrapping Article 370 of its constitution and ended the special status of Jammu and Kashmir.
He said the conference called by the Indian prime minister “exposed the tall claims about normalcy of the situation in Jammu and Kashmir” which “ended up in failure”. He said there is “a wide gulf” between the aspirations of Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP) government and the true representatives of Kashmiris who remain in search of their identity and the basic right of self-determination.
Qureshi said the last two years in occupied Jammu and Kashmir were all about the “siege of Kashmiri people” with routine incidents of extrajudicial killings, illegal detentions and abductions. “India has exercised all tools of state oppression to curb the determination of Kashmiris, however it has failed to subjugate them,” he said.
He mentioned that India’s illegal act resulted in economic loss with 50 per cent of industries closed in the valley.
To a question on India bringing demographic changes in occupied Jammu and Kashmir, he said since the step would have far-reaching implications, Pakistan had highlighted the matter at the highest fora including United Nations General Assembly, UN Security Council, during bilateral interactions of at the levels of prime minister and foreign minister, through parliamentary engagement and Geneva Council of Human Rights.
Qureshi, in response to a question on Prime Minister Imran Khan’s statement that nuclear capability would serve no purpose with the resolution of Kashmir dispute, said the country’s nuclear policy had “no aggressive designs”.
He, however, said that keeping the nuclear deterrent was in view of the neighbouring country which could have belligerent motives. “Such a decision [nuclear disarmament] is dependent on several factors, including the security environment, outstanding disputes and balance of force,” he said.
Asked if Pakistan and India were holding a backdoor channel of communication, he categorically dismissed the notion, however, said there existed a “time-to-time interaction at the intelligence level in area of regional security”.
To a question on rising violence in Afghanistan, he said Pakistan was concerned about the situation where several elements and “spoilers” could be held responsible who did not want to see peace and stability in Afghanistan.
He said Pakistan had been advocating and facilitating the Afghan peace process with its role of “becoming a part of solution and not problem”. “A negotiated political settlement in Afghanistan is in everybody’s Interest and is the best way forward,” he said.
Qureshi emphasised that the Afghans, including the government and Taliban, needed to sit together. “Whatever the outcome evolves out of their negotiations, Pakistan will respect that,” he added. “We will remain the partners of peace and not conflict.” Asked about the blame-game against Pakistan ahead of the meeting between US President Joe Biden and Afghan president Ashraf Ghani, he said: “They [Afghan government representatives] can say whatever they want, but the US knows Pakistan’s role very well and the world is not oblivious to our role.” The foreign minister said peace and stability in Afghanistan would ensure development and regional connectivity. However in case of a setback, Afghans would suffer the most, he added.
-
Eric Dane’s Friends Initiate GoFundMe To 'support' His Two Daughters After His Death At 53 -
Internet Erupts After Candace Owens Claims Elon Musk And Sam Altman Are ‘not Human’ -
Will Princess Beatrice, Eugenie Stay In Contact With Andrew? Source Speaks Out -
‘AI Revolution Is Coming Fast & US Has No Clue,’ Bernie Sanders Warns Of Speed Of Disruption -
Hong Kong Touts Stability,unique Trade Advantages As Trump’s Global Tariff Sparks Market Volatility -
‘Miracle On Ice’ Redux? US Men Chase First Olympic Hockey Gold In 46 Years Against Canada -
Friedrich Merz Heads To China For High Stakes Talks In An Effort To Reset Strained Trade Relations -
Astronauts Face Life Threatening Risk On Boeing Starliner, NASA Says -
Hailey Bieber Reveals How Having Ovarian Cysts Is 'never Fun' -
Kayla Nicole Looks Back On Travis Kelce Split, Calls It ‘right Person, Wrong Time’ -
Prince William And Kate Middleton Extend Support Message After Curling Team Reaches Olympic Gold Final -
Nvidia CEO Praises Elon Musk, Calls Him An ‘extraordinary Engineer' -
Shia LaBeouf's Mugshot Released After Mardi Gras Arrest On Battery Allegations In New Orleans -
Timothee Chalamet Felt '17 Again' After Reunion With 'Interstellar' Director Christopher Nolan -
Conan O'Brien Speaks First Time After Rob Reiner's Killing -
Giant Tortoise Reintroduced To Island After Almost 200 Years