Petition against maintenance allowance dismissed
By our correspondents
November 21, 2017
LAHORE :The Lahore High Court on Monday dismissed a petition of a man with Rs50,000 cost/fine, who disowned fatherhood of his daughter to challenge a lower court’s decision of giving maintenance allowance to his daughter.
Khalid Javed of Nankana Sahib had filed the petition against the decision issued by a family court wherein he was ordered to pay Rs 5,000 per month to his minor daughter living with his former wife. The man had also denied the legitimacy of the child before the family court but his argument was rejected as a matter of jurisdiction.
He took same plea before the high court while challenging the family court’s order. The petitioner through counsel contended that since their marriage in 2006 his wife remained at her parents’ house and never lived with him. Later, the petitioner said, he disassociated himself from his wife due to her alleged immoral character.
The counsel argued that the minor was not the daughter of the petitioner and she was not entitled to claim maintenance allowance.He asked the court to set aside the decision of the family court for being illegal and without lawful jurisdiction. Justice Shahid Jamil took strong notice of the plea taken by the petitioner and dismissed his petition with cost/fine of Rs 50,000.
Khalid Javed of Nankana Sahib had filed the petition against the decision issued by a family court wherein he was ordered to pay Rs 5,000 per month to his minor daughter living with his former wife. The man had also denied the legitimacy of the child before the family court but his argument was rejected as a matter of jurisdiction.
He took same plea before the high court while challenging the family court’s order. The petitioner through counsel contended that since their marriage in 2006 his wife remained at her parents’ house and never lived with him. Later, the petitioner said, he disassociated himself from his wife due to her alleged immoral character.
The counsel argued that the minor was not the daughter of the petitioner and she was not entitled to claim maintenance allowance.He asked the court to set aside the decision of the family court for being illegal and without lawful jurisdiction. Justice Shahid Jamil took strong notice of the plea taken by the petitioner and dismissed his petition with cost/fine of Rs 50,000.
-
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Throws King Charles A Diplomatic Crisis -
Barack Obama Hails Seahawks Super Bowl Win, Calls Defense ‘special’ -
Pregnant Women With Depression Likely To Have Kids With Autism -
$44B Sent By Mistake: South Korea Demands Tougher Crypto Regulations -
Lady Gaga Makes Surprising Cameo During Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Performance -
Paul Brothers Clash Over Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Performance -
South Korea: Two Killed As Military Helicopter Crashes During Training -
Elon Musk Unveils SpaceX’s Moon-first Strategy With ‘self Growing Lunar City’ -
Donald Trump Slams Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Performance: 'Absolutely Terrible' -
Jake Paul Criticizes Bad Bunny's Super Bowl LX Halftime Show: 'Fake American' -
Prince William Wants Uncle Andrew In Front Of Police: What To Expect Of Future King -
Antioxidants Found To Be Protective Agents Against Cognitive Decline -
Hong Kong Court Sentences Media Tycoon Jimmy Lai To 20-years: Full List Of Charges Explained -
Coffee Reduces Cancer Risk, Research Suggests -
Katie Price Defends Marriage To Lee Andrews After Receiving Multiple Warnings -
Seahawks Super Bowl Victory Parade 2026: Schedule, Route & Seattle Celebration Plans