Petition against maintenance allowance dismissed
By our correspondents
November 21, 2017
LAHORE :The Lahore High Court on Monday dismissed a petition of a man with Rs50,000 cost/fine, who disowned fatherhood of his daughter to challenge a lower court’s decision of giving maintenance allowance to his daughter.
Khalid Javed of Nankana Sahib had filed the petition against the decision issued by a family court wherein he was ordered to pay Rs 5,000 per month to his minor daughter living with his former wife. The man had also denied the legitimacy of the child before the family court but his argument was rejected as a matter of jurisdiction.
He took same plea before the high court while challenging the family court’s order. The petitioner through counsel contended that since their marriage in 2006 his wife remained at her parents’ house and never lived with him. Later, the petitioner said, he disassociated himself from his wife due to her alleged immoral character.
The counsel argued that the minor was not the daughter of the petitioner and she was not entitled to claim maintenance allowance.He asked the court to set aside the decision of the family court for being illegal and without lawful jurisdiction. Justice Shahid Jamil took strong notice of the plea taken by the petitioner and dismissed his petition with cost/fine of Rs 50,000.
Khalid Javed of Nankana Sahib had filed the petition against the decision issued by a family court wherein he was ordered to pay Rs 5,000 per month to his minor daughter living with his former wife. The man had also denied the legitimacy of the child before the family court but his argument was rejected as a matter of jurisdiction.
He took same plea before the high court while challenging the family court’s order. The petitioner through counsel contended that since their marriage in 2006 his wife remained at her parents’ house and never lived with him. Later, the petitioner said, he disassociated himself from his wife due to her alleged immoral character.
The counsel argued that the minor was not the daughter of the petitioner and she was not entitled to claim maintenance allowance.He asked the court to set aside the decision of the family court for being illegal and without lawful jurisdiction. Justice Shahid Jamil took strong notice of the plea taken by the petitioner and dismissed his petition with cost/fine of Rs 50,000.
-
Winter Olympics 2026: Lindsey Vonn’s Olympic Comeback Ends In Devastating Downhill Crash -
Adrien Brody Opens Up About His Football Fandom Amid '2026 Super Bowl' -
Barbra Streisand's Obsession With Cloning Revealed -
What Did Olivia Colman Tell Her Husband About Her Gender? -
'We Were Deceived': Noam Chomsky's Wife Regrets Epstein Association -
Patriots' WAGs Slam Cardi B Amid Plans For Super Bowl Party: She Is 'attention-seeker' -
Martha Stewart On Surviving Rigorous Times Amid Upcoming Memoir Release -
Prince Harry Seen As Crucial To Monarchy’s Future Amid Andrew, Fergie Scandal -
Chris Robinson Spills The Beans On His, Kate Hudson's Son's Career Ambitions -
18-month Old On Life-saving Medication Returned To ICE Detention -
Major Hollywood Stars Descend On 2026 Super Bowl's Exclusive Party -
Cardi B Says THIS About Bad Bunny's Grammy Statement -
Sarah Ferguson's Silence A 'weakness Or Strategy' -
Garrett Morris Raves About His '2 Broke Girls' Co-star Jennifer Coolidge -
Winter Olympics 2026: When & Where To Watch The Iconic Ice Dance ? -
Melissa Joan Hart Reflects On Social Challenges As A Child Actor