Assange starts legal bid to unseal US charges against him
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange petitioned an international human rights commission on Wednesday to order Donald Trump’s administration to unseal charges against him as he fights possible extradition to the United States.
The controversial freedom of information campaigner has been holed up in Ecuador’s embassy in London since obtaining political asylum from the Latin American country in August 2012. The Australian no longer risks being sent back to Sweden after its authorities dropped a rape investigation against him in 2017.
But his case regained the international spotlight after The Guardian reported in November that he was secretly visited by Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort in the run-up to the US presidential vote.
Both sides have denied the story and The Guardian has amended some elements of its report. But it prompted the US Justice Department to begin questioning diplomatic staff who were at the embassy at the time as part of its investigation into the Trump campaign’s possible ties to Russia.
Assange’s application was filed by his lawyers with the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights (IACHR). The commission is part of the Organisation of American States (OAS) of which the US is a founding member.
"The urgent request is in the form of a comprehensive 1,172-page application for ‘precautionary measures’ directed to the international body which monitors compliance of the US and Ecuador with their binding legal obligations," WIkiLeaks said in a statement. The IACHR told AFP that it follows up on petitions such as the one being made by Assange by requesting information from the US State Department.
"When the commission has enough information to make a decision, it can decide to grant or not grant a precautionary measure," the IACHR said in a written statement. "If it decides to grant it, it usually requests the state of the country involved to take certain actions."
IACHR decisions are binding under international law. It was not immediately apparent what would happen if the US failed to comply. The US charges against Assange came to light when he was inadvertantly mentioned in an unrelated court filing in November.
The fact that the charges were filed -- but not what they actually were -- was later confirmed by The New York Times. Assange originally fell foul of US authorities after WikiLeaks began publishing troves of classified Pentagon and State Department documents in 2010. The whistleblowing website shot to prominence again when it released thousand of Democratic National Committee emails during the 2016 US presidential election campaign.
-
Meta Rolls Out Dashboard To Stop AI Reposts -
Tech CEOs Predicts AI Replacing Software Engineers -
Where To Watch The 2026 Oscars Around The World & More: Everything To Know -
Harry Styles Displays Public Affection For Zoe Kravitz At ‘SNL’ Afterparty -
'Extremely Cautious' Sarah Ferguson Ordeal Comes To Light After Royal Lodge -
Inside The US-China Economic Meeting In Paris: Key Talks Ahead Of Trump-Xi Summit Explained -
Lainey Wilson ‘in The Weeds’ As First-ever Stagecoach Performance Nears -
Magazine Comes ‘begging’ To Kylie Jenner Ahead Of Oscars 2026: ‘No One Cares Anymore’ -
Rita Ora Added To Star-studded Line-up For Iconic Isle Of Wight Festival -
Is AI Making Us Less Human? Psychologist Speak Out -
Daniel Radcliffe Recalls ‘mind-blowing’ Moment From ‘Harry Potter’ -
King Charles Takes 'decisive' Action Against Princess Eugenie, Beatrice -
Mariah Carey 'embarrasses' Son Moroccan On Twitch Yet Again: 'my Mom's Here' -
2026 Oscars: Nicole Kidman Breaks Down One Thing She'll Never Forgo Before An Award Show -
Lewis Hamilton Shares Heartfelt Statement After His Ex-girlfriend Warned Kim Kardashian -
Watch: Harry Styles Tickles Ribs With A Hilarious Restyling Of The ‘ordinary Man’