Sarah Ferguson misjudgment lands her in questionable waters: ‘Law enforcement needs her’

Despite Sarah Ferguson admitting multiple times that her decision to associate with known sex offender Jeffrey Epstein was a “catastrophic misjudgment” there are many, not just royal biographer Andrew Lownie who believe “it’s increasingly hard to believe it was an honest mistake.”

Especially considering how many shocking details have since emerged that paint a picture of how closely intertwined her life became with his.

The whole thing has been highlighted on the royal biographer and author’s Substack.

On it he touched on the images released by the Department of Justice, showing Fergie on couch, at one of Epstein’s properties with an unnamed woman.

She is also said to have maintained her friendship with Epstein until long after he was convicted of soliciting a minor in Florida.

The series of questions it sparked show the expert questioning “how did it not occur to her, on encountering multiple households full of disturbing sexualised artwork and photographs, and populated by a regular rotation of very young women, that this was not a man she should associate with?”

He also noted that while “these files do not resolve the question of what Sarah Ferguson knew or understood about Epstein’s crimes. They do, however, sharpen the focus on how closely intertwined her life became with his, and each new fragment that emerges narrows the space available for ambiguity.”

“Like Andrew, Sarah is a material witness and should be interviewed by lawyers of the victims and by law enforcement. It is the very least she could, and should, do,” he concluded by saying.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------