Sunday May 26, 2024

Criticising army Imran Khan's constitutional right: Asad Umar

Rejecting Vawda's claims regarding PTI's long march, Shah Mehmood Qureshi clarifies march towards Islamabad will be peaceful

By Web Desk
October 27, 2022

PTI Secretary-General Asad Umar addressing a press conference in Lahore on October 27, 2022. — Screengrab via YouTube
PTI Secretary-General Asad Umar addressing a press conference in Lahore on October 27, 2022. — Screengrab via YouTube

LAHORE: Hours after an important presser was held by the top brass of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), PTI Wednesday said it was former prime minister Imran Khan’s "constitutional right to criticise the Pakistan Army."

"You can disagree with Khan's criticism, but whatever he says is for the betterment of the army and the country. It is his constitutional right to criticise the army," Asad Umar said while addressing a press conference in Islamabad, flanked by PTI Vice-Chairman Shah Mehmood Qureshi and Senior Vice-President Fawad Chaudhry.

Umar said that a chunk of the presser held by the Director-General Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) Lieutenant Gen Nadeem Anjum and Director-General of the  Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) Lieutenant-General Babar Iftikhar "focused on PTI."

The PTI leader said Khan has, time and again, expressed his views on the armed forces' role — "he believes that a strong army is crucial for Pakistan, given its strategical position".

Umar said the PTI chairman owns the armed forces and the nation and he has "never" maligned the armed forces abroad — whether in the United Kingdom or the United States.

"But Imran Khan [does not] agree with every decision of the armed forces. Are there some decisions or actions [of the armed forces] that he criticises? Yes, he definitely does that."

Umar said the Constitution empowers the PTI chief to criticise the military. "But all that criticism, in Khan's view, is directed towards the betterment of the country and the military."

Umar said Khan has never uttered a word to weaken the institution.

"[In their press conference, the military officials] said that levelling allegations against the institution's leadership was inappropriate [...] but I would like to ask that if the leadership of the armed forces has its importance, then doesn't the reputation of country's biggest leader matter?"

The PTI leader said that it was indeed important for both sides to rethink their positions.

Umar praised the armed forces for sticking to their Constitutional role but asked the military what were the unconstitutional demands that Khan made during closed-door meetings.

"The political, economic, and social crises that are taking place in the country are unprecedented and early elections are the only solution for it," Umar said.

'All things being discussed behind closed doors aren't secret'

But Umar noted that Khan had demanded the military to use its influence for stability in the country, and it is not "unconstitutional". "All the things that are being discussed behind closed doors aren't secret. Imran Khan has discussed them in rallies and press conferences."

"However, it is important to seek answers as to why this situation is arising in the country. We need to think about it, but when we will take a look at the events that transpired, we will see that institutions have also made some mistakes," he added.

"DG ISI said that then-prime minister Imran Khan told him that the then-opposition leader was the biggest problem in the country. He was right, it has been proven via literature that the law should be upheld otherwise a country cannot progress," Umar said.

Umar added that the DG ISI mentioned that in the past, Pakistan was divided into two parts due to "hatred". "It happened because the wishes of the people were not respected."

The response came after DG ISI made a surprise appearance during a press conference earlier in the day and berated the former prime minister for making "unconstitutional" demands.

In a direct jibe at the PTI chief, DG Lt Gen Anjum said that it is not possible that the former prime minister can meet army chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa at night and then call him a "traitor in the day".

“If the commander-in-chief is a traitor then why did you meet him in hiding? Meeting [him] is your right but it cannot be possible that you meet at night and call [him] a traitor in the day,” asked the DG ISI. 

'Vawda's presser an attempt to damage people's confidence on PTI'

Lambasting former minister Faisal Vawda for "spreading fear among the masses", Qureshi clarified that the party's much-awaited long march towards Islamabad will be peaceful and will be held as per the laws.

“I feel that  [Faisal Vawda’s] presser yesterday was an attempt to spread fear among the PTI supporters and has triggered fear among the masses,” he said.

A day earlier, following Vawda's claims of a long march marred with “bloodshed, death and funerals”, the PTI had distanced itself from the former minister’s statement and suspended his party membership.

At the outset of the presser, Qureshi recalled that on May 25, the party's rally was "attacked" by the then-Punjab government.

"We could not defend ourselves. The way our people were tortured and put behind bars, everyone is aware of that," the former foreign minister said.

Reiterating that the PTI’s policy was clear regarding a peaceful long march, Qureshi termed yesterday’s presser an "attempt to damage the confidence that people have in PTI which —  in our opinion — failed because the details came to the forefront soon.”

He elaborated that news channels that don’t give coverage to PTI, especially PTV, showed the entire press conference of Vawda live, soon after which messages from London [Nawaz Sharif] started pouring in which linked all the missing dots, “highlighting that it was a pre-planned move.”

“The coalition government is propagating the narrative that the PTI wants political instability, however, we have no such intentions,” Qureshi said, adding that the country is already facing political instability which began when they [ruling alliance] planned the no-confidence motion against Khan.

Renewing his demand for a free and fair snap poll, the former foreign minister said that elections can bring the “much-needed stability in the country.”

Qureshi assured journalists that the PTI's long march would remain peaceful and the party would march towards Islamabad in line with the Constitution.

“I urge people to participate in PTI’s long march with enthusiasm, without any fears, as it is a step towards Khan’s Haqeedi Azadi agenda,” he said, advising them to have trust in the leadership.

'Cypher was and is a reality'

Addressing the constant criticism over the “foreign cypher”, the PTI leader said: “We have been constantly saying that the cypher was and is a reality.”

He recalled that when a meeting was held regarding the cypher, “where I was present along with Imran Khan and Asad Umar we were informed that cypher is an important issue and a demarche should be issued to the ambassador over this, following which several sessions, including one of the National Security Committee, was called.

“If it was a conspiracy [as the ruling alliance claims it to be] then what was the need for demarche and why was it referred to as political interference?” Qureshi raised questions, rejecting all accusations regarding PTI forcing the Pakistani ambassador to do such a thing.

Qureshi recalled that the Pakistani ambassador said he had never seen such language in his entire diplomatic experience.

“We did not build any narrative that could harm Pakistan,” he said, adding that the PTI has always respected the institutions and defended them at every turn.

ISPR’s presser was ‘shocking’

For his part, Fawad Chaudhry said ISPR’s presser came as a “shock”, adding that President Dr Arif Alvi wrote a letter to the Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial informing him about the nitty-gritty of the cypher.

Regarding journalist Arshad Sharif’s killing, Fawad said that the threats received by the deceased were "not hidden from anybody as he had also informed the president about the threat to his life in a letter."

The former information minister clarified that Sharif did not leave Pakistan on the directions of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government; “he left Pakistan because he wasn’t being allowed to speak.”