Saturday September 25, 2021

‘Master plan dept accountable for Nasla Tower issue’

The plot’s original area was 780 square yards (sq yds), but commercial status was accorded to 1,044 sq yds.
June 28, 2021
Nasla Tower.
Nasla Tower.

Jamaat-e-Islami’s Saifuddin Advocate, who was the Nazim of union council 6 in 2007, when the residential plot on which the Nasla Tower was later constructed was given commercial status, says the job of his UC office was only that of a postman.

He explained that the UC office used to dispatch the applications of change in the status of land to the master plan department with or without objections. The Muttahida Qaumi Movement’s Mustafa Kamal was Karachi’s mayor at that time, so the department was under him.

The plot’s original area was 780 square yards (sq yds), but commercial status was accorded to 1,044 sq yds. The Supreme Court recently directed the city commissioner to remove all occupants from the building in the Sindhi Muslim Cooperative Housing Society (SMCHS), and then demolish it.

The court observed that after the examination of the record, there was no doubt that the building was constructed on encroached land, and among other things, also blocked the service road.

With just one objection by the non-profit Shehri, Saifuddin had issued a no-objection certificate for the conversion of land use on March 13, 2007, during his term as UC-6 Nazim.

On September 22, 2007, when Kamal was mayor, the master plan department under the City District Government Karachi formally approved the plot’s conversion from residential to commercial status, allowing shops, offices and flats to be constructed.

As a matter of routine, after publishing a notice for holding a hearing to listen to objections, the department used to share the cases of conversion of land status with the relevant UCs, explained Saifuddin.

“Whatever objections were raised during the public hearing, we used to forward them to the master plan department,” he said, adding that the final approval for commercial status was the department’s job.

He said they used to check if the plot was situated on a road that had already been declared commercial, so the application for change of land status did not seem to be problematic. “We also used to see if the [conversion of land] is creating a nuisance for the public. For example, if a cinema or a liquor store is being established,” he said, adding that if such nuisances were found, they used to report to the master plan department with their objections.

He stressed that even the recent SC order does not target commercialisation, but rather the illegal allotment of land. “If the SMCHS has illegally allotted the land, they should be asked about it.”

As for the JI’s stance on the issue, he said: “Whatever wrong or right happened has happened. Ultimately, the end-user or buyer is suffering now. If the plot can be regularised now, it should be.”

Plot No. A-193, on which the Nasla Tower stands today, originally measured 780 sq yds in 1950. The SMCHS allotted an additional 264 sq yds of the service road of Sharea Faisal to the then owner of the plot, increasing its size to 1,044 sq yds. Commercial status was accorded to the entire 1,044 sq yds.

Saifuddin said the conversion of land form mentions only the size of the plot, and not when and how it was increased. He said it was the master plan department’s job to go through the details of the plot before giving it commercial status.

He stressed that the department should also have checked the record before regularising the additional service road. Kamal could not be reached for comment despite repeated attempts.