Returning officers told to comment on plea against rejection of PPP, PSP forms
An election tribunal on Tuesday issued notices to returning officers over a petition of candidates affiliated with the Pakistan People Party (PPP) and the Pak Sarzameen Party (PSP) challenging the rejection of their nomination forms for National Assembly constituencies in Karachi.
PPP candidate Abdul Qadir Patel and PSP candidate Waseem Aftab had approached the election tribunal against the rejection of their nomination forms for the NA-248 (West-I) and NA-246 (South-I) constituencies in the city.
The petitioners’ counsel told the election tribunal that his clients had submitted all the requisite details in their respective nomination forms, but the returning officers still rejected them. The PPP and PSP candidates requested the court to set aside the returning officers’ decision and direct them to approve the nomination forms for contesting the July 25 general elections.
After the preliminary hearing of the petition, the election tribunal issued notices to the relevant returning officers and told them to submit their respective comments on June 21.
Price hike
The Sindh High Court directed the finance ministry to file comments on a petition seeking the promotion of social and economic well-being of the people as well as the details of loans being borrowed by the government.
Petitioner Bisma Noreen told the high court that Article 38 of the Constitution guarantees the promotion of social and economic well-being of the country’s citizens, but the government has failed to implement it in letter and spirit.
She said the government has been borrowing loans from international banks and imposing extra taxes on the people. She sought the implementation of Article 38 of the Constitution and the details of the government’s internal and external loans.
The section officer of the finance department appeared before the court and sought time to file comments. The court then directed the finance ministry to file comments on the petition and adjourned the hearing for a date to be fixed later by the office.
-
Can AI Bully Humans? Bot Publicly Criticises Engineer After Code Rejection -
Search For Savannah Guthrie’s Abducted Mom Enters Unthinkable Phase -
Imagine Dragons Star, Dan Reynolds Recalls 'frustrating' Diagnosis -
Steve Jobs Once Called Google Over Single Shade Of Yellow: Here’s Why -
Barack Obama Addresses UFO Mystery: Aliens Are ‘real’ But Debunks Area 51 Conspiracy Theories -
Selma Blair Explains Why Multiple Sclerosis 'isn't So Scary' -
Will Smith Surprises Wife Jada Pinkett With Unusual Gift On Valentine's Day -
Shamed Andrew Has Paid Royal Favours With ‘national Scandal’ -
Prince William Ticked Off By How Andrew ‘behaved With Staff’ -
Prince William Questions Himself ‘what’s The Point’ After Saudi Trip -
James Van Der Beek's Friends Helped Fund Ranch Purchase Before His Death At 48 -
King Charles ‘very Much’ Wants Andrew To Testify At US Congress -
Rosie O’Donnell Secretly Returned To US To Test Safety -
Meghan Markle, Prince Harry Spotted On Date Night On Valentine’s Day -
King Charles Butler Spills Valentine’s Day Dinner Blunders -
Brooklyn Beckham Hits Back At Gordon Ramsay With Subtle Move Over Remark On His Personal Life