ISLAMABAD: Amidst challenging and stressful wave of inflation, a total of 68 percent Pakistanis have reduced their expenses, the latest Pulse Consultant’s survey reveals.
In the study by Pulse Consultant, respondents were asked, “What expenses have you reduced due to inflation” The responses were:
23 percent of respondents stopped going out for dinner because of rising inflation, whereas 14pc claimed they stopped going for outing. Two percent reported they have even reduced their spending on fuel.
Four percent of women participants reported they have reduced their spending on personal care, while two percent male reported the same.
Five percent reported they have reduced consumption of meat, milk and fruit in their daily life.
A total of 15pc of total respondents reported they have reduced electricity consumption. On an overall level basis, 21pc of respondents reduced spending on grocery items. Some 33pc of women said the same.
In addition to this, 10pc of women claimed they now avoid going for shopping, whereas seven percent reported they have stopped the purchase of clothes and shoes.
On the other hand, 32pc of the respondents claimed they reduced nothing and were spending the same on daily commodities as before. Later in this month, Pulse Consultant will launch a second round of urban-based syndicated study gauging the impact
of inflation on purchasing and consumption with a sample of 1,800+respondents —both male and female—in 17 major cities of Pakistan.
Trump said a potential deal to spin off the U.S. assets of TikTok is still “on the table” days after it was put on...
He said suggestions will be given at seminar to remove obstacles in improving relationship between employers and...
Court had also ordered the convict to pay Rs500,000 in compensation to the heirs of the victim
Five-member constitutional bench of the apex court, headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan, heard matter
Premature easing of macroeconomic policies could trigger a renewed balance-of-payments crisis, warns lender
FBR ignored FTO’s instructions, saying this matter does not fall within the purview of Tax Ombudsman