Reko Diq project: SC asks why govt wants to amend Mineral Act instead of Mineral Rules
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Tuesday questioned whether the government could not make amendments to the Mineral Rules instead of the act.
A five-member larger bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice Umer Ata Bandail and comprising Justice Ijazul Ahsen, Justice Muneeb Akhtar, Justice Yahya Afridi and Justice Jamal Khan Mandokel heard the Presidential Reference regarding the new Reko Diq Project. During the hearing, Justice Yahya Afridi questioned why the government wanted to make amendments to the Mines and Mineral Act 1948 instead of making amendments to Mineral Rules.
If fundamental rights were affected by making amendments in the Mines and Mineral Act 1948, then the court will intervene”, Justice Yahya Afridi remarked. The court also questioned as to whether the federation and provinces will simultaneously utilize the one law. Additional Attorney General Aamir Rehman submitted that in the 1973 constitution, the 1948 Act was neither enlisted in the Federal List nor Provincial List. He further submitted that under the 1973 Constitution, some provisions of the Mines and Mineral Act 1948 were delegated to the federation and some to provinces.
Commencing his arguments, Salahuddin, counsel for Balochistan Government submitted that the Presidential Reference seeking the opinion of the apex court on the new Reko Diq project is maintainable for being a public interest matter adding that the President of Pakistan was competent to send the reference. He submitted that some observations were given that the questions put in the Presidential Reference were ambiguous and added that questions before the court don’t need to be sent on the right points. He submitted the court could also give its opinion on the questions, raised during arguments in the proceedings as well.
To support his stance, the counsel for the Balochistan government cited a judgment of the Indian Supreme Court wherein it had held that the court could also give its opinion on the questions, raised during the arguments. Chief Justice Umer Ata Bandial observed that the court will give its opinion only on the legal questions, raised in the Presidential Reference. Later, the court adjourned the hearing for today (Wednesday).
-
Cybercrime: British Man Charged In Dubai For Allegedly Filming Missiles In Breach Of UAE Rules -
Amazon Withdraws From Drone Trade Group 'Prime Air' Over Safety Concerns -
Pentagon Says 'no Chance' Of Renewed Anthropic Negotiations After Legal Dispute Over AI Technology -
King Charles Leaves Harry And Meghan In Shadows Of Palace Drama -
Meghan Markle’s Dissatisfaction From Harry Grows: ‘It Would’ve Given Us More Credibility’ -
Prince William, Kate Middleton Embark On 'exploring' Mission -
Sarah Ferguson’s Plans For A Royal Tell-all That ‘exposes It All’ Gets Rude Awakening -
Royal Snub: Woman Ignores Prince William And Kate Middleton In London -
Kate Middleton Talks About Her Cancer Once More: ‘something I Have To Be A Lot More Conscious’ -
Steve Tisch: Another Powerful Man Bites The Dust Over Epstein Links -
Prince William Takes The Wheel Of RNLI Lifeboat In Unexpected Moment After Visit To Borough Market -
Lloyds Bank Apologizes After Major Data Glitch Hits Customers, Launches Probe Into Data Breach -
Kate Middleton Given Huge Duty By King Charles Ahead Of Key Visit -
Kat Dennings Remembers Anton Yelchin On His 37th Birthday -
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s Paternity Comes Under Question: ‘Philip Was Never His Father’ -
Martin Short Sparks Fear As He 'shuts Himself Away' After Family Tragedy