Prince William saw Meghan Markle political views differed from that of the royal family, claim experts.
Vanity Fair's Dynasty hosts Katie Nicholl and Erin Vanderhoof talked about William's reservations against his sister-in-law, saying, "William's issues with Meghan seen to go beyond his conflict with his younger brother and Meghan's charismatic approach".
Ms Vanderhoof said: "According to expert Robert Lacey, William thought Meghan's political causes were too trendy and disharmonious.
"[These were] exemplified by that 2019 issue of British Vogue she [Meghan] edited".
Ms Vanderhoof continued: "It didn't go with his [William] vision of what the monarchy should be.
"When William mentioned this to Harry, it apparently caused a really bad argument".
Co-host Katie Nicholl then added: "Well I think for William some of Meghan's causes might have veered too close to politics.
"But she was never going to stop speaking out about the things that mattered to her.
"Let's remember we are dealing with someone who has been speaking against sexism on the news since she was 11-years-old".
Ms Nicholl continued: "Meghan has said that women have a voice, they need to be empowered and she's going to use her voice.
"We heard it from the very beginning when she said she wanted to hit the ground running, which is exactly what she did".
Meghan along with husband Prince Harry eventually stepped away from her royal duties in 2020. The couple now lives in Montecito, California.
'The Super Mario Bros. Movie' is a collaboration between Universal, Illumination, and Nintendo
The series follows pop idol Jocelyn, portrayed by Lily-Rose Depp, as she grapples with her mother's death and...
Last year's Kick Off show showcased Camila Cabello's captivating performance at France's Stade de France
"Across the Spider-Verse" had a successful international debut as well, earning $88.1 million from 59 territories
Karen Gillan is best known for playing Nebula in Marvel's 'Guardians of the Galaxy'
Calling for fair negotiations, the WGA urges Apple to contribute a mere $17 million per year to address writers' demands