Prince Harry gets interrogated over ‘counterintuitive’ move

Barely any positive coverage has followed the Duke and Duchess of Sussex since their move to the UK was announced, and since questions have gotten even worse. Its gotten to the point where one historian even opened a frenzy over other aspects that many may not have even considered.

The royal historian in question is Justin Vovk, and he touched on it all in his chat with the CBC.

He believes this surprise homecoming is the most “counterintuitive” and “contradictory to everything” that “they have said since the moment they left”.

“Regardless of whatever their reasons are, their return creates massive shockwaves,” he also warned while mentioning the title wave of aftereffects they welcome by even breathing different air.

However, where he wound up spending the most of his time is with the following questions; “What does this mean for Harry and Meghan as a couple? What does this mean for Harry and Meghan and their children as a family unit? How will this impact relations with the rest of the Royals? How will the monarchy respond to this? How will the British public respond to this? How will in particular the tabloid and the predatory media respond to this?” even “how will Harry engage with the media in light of his wins and losses in court over the past year regarding media intrusions?” was also posed as a concern by the historian whose seen things go from Britian – Canada – USA – Britian, all in the span of a few years.

However, in his own concluding words he shot down any chances at an explanation with the following words, “we're probably not going to hear a word about anything from them because anything that is said, people will jump on, people will try to read into it.”

What is known as of yet about this move is very broad but very minuscule. Currently the only thing fans are aware is that this move is for an “extended period of time” and while some experts and commentators wonder if the issue is Harry’s visa status, insight into this is likely to be kept under wraps, as was the case when the Heritage Society petitioned to see his records due to past admissions of drug use, which by US law should have made it impossible for the Duke to obtain a visa at all—unless the alternate was hiding said information, which would have opened a whole new can of worms.