Senate stakes
We badly need political consensus and greater willingness to look at the long-term interests of our country ahead of the Senate elections which will take place on March 5. At present, all the political parties are vying to put their own interests first rather than help evolve the political culture
By our correspondents
March 01, 2015
We badly need political consensus and greater willingness to look at the long-term interests of our country ahead of the Senate elections which will take place on March 5. At present, all the political parties are vying to put their own interests first rather than help evolve the political culture based on integrity that we so badly need. The meeting of parliamentary party leaders held on Friday on the prime minister’s call did not lead towards this. The sharp divide among political parties on the government’s proposal that Senate polls be held through a show of hands rather than a secret ballot, and a constitutional amendment made to allow this, remained unresolved. While the PML-N and the PTI back the suggestion, and the MQM expressed approval for it on Friday, the PPP and JUI-F have vehemently opposed anything other than a secret ballot. Calls for building a consensus rather than bull-dozing through a last minute amendment came from the ANP and JWP – but essentially nothing was agreed on.
Essentially, all parties are looking out only for themselves and trying to see how they can gain the few votes, perhaps from rebellious representatives from another party that may earn them an extra seat or two in the Upper House. This is all based on the immediate. But gains made in this manner will not really help us evolve a better system or a political culture that is able to correct – through a built-in system of checks and balances – the many wrongs that exist within it. In many ways, this is dependent on political parties altering themselves, introducing more transparency within their own structures, eliminating nepotism and by doing so resolving the issue of their representatives being constantly susceptible to being bought over by others. It is change of this nature that would stand us well in the longer stead rather than bickering over the process to be used now. Rather than creating more divide, it is important instead to work towards constructing agreements and laying down the solid foundation that can turn our Upper House into a body that is truly able to guide the country towards better governance and maturity. For this we need discourse and discussion spread out over a far longer period of time than the hastily called meeting on Friday. Accord cannot be generated instantaneously. It will take time – and all political parties will need to work towards it with genuine good intent rather than watching out only for themselves as is currently happening.
Essentially, all parties are looking out only for themselves and trying to see how they can gain the few votes, perhaps from rebellious representatives from another party that may earn them an extra seat or two in the Upper House. This is all based on the immediate. But gains made in this manner will not really help us evolve a better system or a political culture that is able to correct – through a built-in system of checks and balances – the many wrongs that exist within it. In many ways, this is dependent on political parties altering themselves, introducing more transparency within their own structures, eliminating nepotism and by doing so resolving the issue of their representatives being constantly susceptible to being bought over by others. It is change of this nature that would stand us well in the longer stead rather than bickering over the process to be used now. Rather than creating more divide, it is important instead to work towards constructing agreements and laying down the solid foundation that can turn our Upper House into a body that is truly able to guide the country towards better governance and maturity. For this we need discourse and discussion spread out over a far longer period of time than the hastily called meeting on Friday. Accord cannot be generated instantaneously. It will take time – and all political parties will need to work towards it with genuine good intent rather than watching out only for themselves as is currently happening.
-
Breaking: 2 Dead Several Injured In South Carolina State University Shooting -
China Debuts World’s First AI-powered Earth Observation Satellite For Smart Cities -
Royal Family Desperate To Push Andrew As Far Away As Possible: Expert -
Cruz Beckham Releases New Romantic Track 'For Your Love' -
5 Celebrities You Didn't Know Have Experienced Depression -
Trump Considers Scaling Back Trade Levies On Steel, Aluminium In Response To Rising Costs -
Claude AI Shutdown Simulation Sparks Fresh AI Safety Concerns -
King Charles Vows Not To Let Andrew Scandal Overshadow His Special Project -
Spotify Says Its Best Engineers No Longer Write Code As AI Takes Over -
Michelle Yeoh Addresses 'Wicked For Good' Snub At 2026 Oscars -
Trump Revokes Legal Basis For US Climate Regulation, Curb Vehicle Emission Standards -
DOJ Blocks Trump Administration From Cutting $600M In Public Health Funds -
2026 Winter Olympics Men Figure Skating: Malinin Eyes Quadruple Axel, After Banned Backflip -
Meghan Markle Rallies Behind Brooklyn Beckham Amid Explosive Family Drama -
Scientists Find Strange Solar System That Breaks Planet Formation Rules -
Backstreet Boys Voice Desire To Headline 2027's Super Bowl Halftime Show