PHC reserves verdict in petitions on LG polls
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Wednesday reserved verdict in writ petitions challenging holding of local government elections 2015 for village and neighbourhood councils on non-party basis and other several sections of the local government law. A division bench comprising Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel and Mrs Justice Irshad
By Akhtar Amin
May 07, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Wednesday reserved verdict in writ petitions challenging holding of local government elections 2015 for village and neighbourhood councils on non-party basis and other several sections of the local government law.
A division bench comprising Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel and Mrs Justice Irshad Qaisar reserved the judgment on two identical constitutional petitions filed by provincial parliamentary leader of Awami National Party (ANP) Sardar Hussain Babak and provincial information secretary of Jamiat UIlema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) Abdul Jalil Jan. The bench also heard preliminary objection of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government against the maintainability of three petitions pertaining to certain sections of the KP Local Government Act 2013 and requested the court to reject them all.
During hearing of the cases, lawyer for the government Qazi Muhammad Anwar told the bench that the petitioners were not aggrieved parties in terms of Article 199 of the Constitution and, therefore, the petitions were not maintainable and liable to be dismissed. Lawyers Khushdil Khan and Abdul Latif Afridi of ANP and Mohammad Essa Khan of JUI-F contended that the petitions were maintainable as their respective clients had challenged important provisions of the KP Local Government Act, which would affect all citizens of the province and the parties had allowed them to challenge the act.
Khushdil Khan insisted his client was the parliamentary leader of a political party and under Article 17 of the Constitution, which guaranteed the right to form association, as well as Article 199, he was entitled to file the petition in question. The bench asked the lawyer that when the schedule for local government elections had already been issued and the process had begun, what implications the acceptance of the petitions could cause.
A division bench comprising Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel and Mrs Justice Irshad Qaisar reserved the judgment on two identical constitutional petitions filed by provincial parliamentary leader of Awami National Party (ANP) Sardar Hussain Babak and provincial information secretary of Jamiat UIlema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) Abdul Jalil Jan. The bench also heard preliminary objection of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government against the maintainability of three petitions pertaining to certain sections of the KP Local Government Act 2013 and requested the court to reject them all.
During hearing of the cases, lawyer for the government Qazi Muhammad Anwar told the bench that the petitioners were not aggrieved parties in terms of Article 199 of the Constitution and, therefore, the petitions were not maintainable and liable to be dismissed. Lawyers Khushdil Khan and Abdul Latif Afridi of ANP and Mohammad Essa Khan of JUI-F contended that the petitions were maintainable as their respective clients had challenged important provisions of the KP Local Government Act, which would affect all citizens of the province and the parties had allowed them to challenge the act.
Khushdil Khan insisted his client was the parliamentary leader of a political party and under Article 17 of the Constitution, which guaranteed the right to form association, as well as Article 199, he was entitled to file the petition in question. The bench asked the lawyer that when the schedule for local government elections had already been issued and the process had begun, what implications the acceptance of the petitions could cause.
-
Bangladesh Sees High Turnout In Landmark National Election -
Lufthansa Cancels Hundreds Of Flights Amid Pilot And Cabin Crew Strike -
Video: Prince Harry Tears Up Talking Of His Court Case & Children: ‘Don’t Feel Shame Even If A Judge Makes Demands' -
King Charles Issues New Statement For ‘carers’ Two Days After Promising To Support Police Action Against Andrew -
Gene Simmons Makes Major Claim Against Rock & Roll Hall Of Fame -
Vladyslav Heraskevych Disqualified From Winter Olympics 2026 Over Helmet Controversy -
Late James Van Der Beek Inspires Bowel Cancer Awareness Post Death -
ByteDance’s New AI Video Model ‘Seedance 2.0’ Goes Viral -
Archaeologists Unearthed Possible Fragments Of Hannibal’s War Elephant In Spain -
Khloe Kardashian Reveals Why She Slapped Ex Tristan Thompson -
‘The Distance’ Song Mastermind, Late Greg Brown Receives Tributes -
Taylor Armstrong Walks Back Remarks On Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Show -
Pal Exposes Sarah Ferguson’s Plans For Her New Home, Settling Down And Post-Andrew Life -
James Van Der Beek's Impact Post Death With Bowel Cancer On The Rise -
Blake Lively, Justin Baldoni At Odds With Each Other Over Settlement -
Thomas Tuchel Set For England Contract Extension Through Euro 2028