The price of militancy
Putting a rupee figure on the tens of thousands of lives lost to the militant menace is impossible. We do, however, have some idea of how much money has been spent fighting militancy. According to recent testimony given by Finance Minister Rana Afzal to the Senate, the state has spent close to Rs300 billion in our war against terrorism in the last decade. A portion of this spending was supposed to be covered by the US but of the $132 million that was pledged for counterterrorism efforts we have only been given $111 million. Now that the Trump administration has suspended most security aid to Pakistan, the country will have to bear an even greater cost in fighting militancy. Much of the money has been spent in the form of military operations like Zarb-e-Azb and in procuring equipment, with a significant portion also allocated to the rebuilding of Fata and the rehabilitation of those who were displaced by the fighting. For all our successes in defeating militant groups, we should not expect any significant drops in counter-terror expenditures in the next decade. Militant groups have shown that they are still capable of striking at any time. If anything, Pakistan may have to spend even more on security for all potential militant targets.
As high as the Rs300 billion figure is, it does not amount to even a fraction of the price the country has paid in fighting the war against militancy. The Pakistan Economic Survey for 2016-17 estimated that the loss of life, damage to the country’s infrastructure and lost economic opportunities since 9/11 cost Pakistan’s economy an astounding $123 billion. This represents nearly 40 percent of the country’s total GDP, giving a scale of just how badly we have been hurt by militancy. This figure alone, more than any pressure from the US or any international resolve, should steel our resolve to be rid of militancy once and for all. Any notion that actors in the state may have of dividing militant groups into ‘good’ and ‘bad’ categories needs to be rejected. Every militant group that has the ability to operate on Pakistani territory – even if they are concentrating on Afghanistan – will eventually turn its guns on us. The lesson we should have learned from the 1980s and 1990s that turning a blind eye to or even supporting militant groups as a way of advancing what we believe to be our interests is not a sustainable policy. Eventually it will end up costing the country dearly, both in lives lost and money squandered.
-
Arden Cho Shares Update On Search For ‘perfect’ Wedding Dress Ahead Of Italy Ceremony -
Ariana Madix Goes Unfiltered About Dating Life -
Prince William Closes Saudi Arabia Visit With Rare Desert Shot -
'King Charles Acts Fast Or Existential Crisis' Over Andrew Scandal -
Brooklyn Beckham Charging Nearly £300 In Ticket Cost For Burger Festival -
Prince William Makes Unexpected Stop At Local Market In Saudi Arabia -
Zayn Malik Shares Important Update About His Love Life -
Kate Middleton, William Are Holding Onto Their Hats As Worse Gets Threatened: Behind The Veil Of Shame -
British Soap Awards Scrapped Again As ITV Confirms 2026 Hiatus -
Climate Nearing Dangerous Tipping Points, Study Shows -
James Van Der Beek, 'Dawson's Creek' Star, Dies At 48 -
Threads Launches Dear Algo AI Feature To Personalise Feeds In Real Time -
Police Take Action Over Andrew's Ties With Jeffrey Epstein While In UK Office -
Courtney Love Makes First Appearance Since New Report On Kurt Cobain's Death -
King Charles Anxious As Uncertainty Grows Over Sarah Ferguson’s Next Move -
Real Reason Kim Kardashian Is Dating Lewis Hamilton