LONDON: In a major relief for Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PMLN) President and Opposition Leader in the National Assembly, a British court has ordered the release of frozen bank accounts of Shehbaz Sharif and his son Suleman Sharif after UK's top anti-corruption body, National Crime Agency (NCA) concluded there was no evidence of money laundering, fraud and criminal conduct, according to evidence seen by The News exclusively.
The Westminster Magistrates Court’s Judge Nicholas Rimmer set aside the two accounts freezing orders (AFO) against Shehbaz Sharif and his son related to a December 2017 case filed by the NCA on the request of the Pakistan government.
The UK top anti-corruption agency filed a unilateral application before Judge Rimmer to declare that its two-year high-profile investigation in jurisdictions of Pakistan, UK and Dubai found no evidence of money laundering and criminal conduct on part of the two Sharifs under investigation.
Documents obtained by The News reveal that bank accounts of Suleman Sharif were frozen and Shehbaz Sharif’s accounts were probed through a December 17, 2019 court order and both were subjected to high-profile criminal forensic investigation under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA), conducted by the NCA’s Investigations Command at the International Corruption Unit. Their accounts were frozen after the Pakistan government asked UK to “assist in the recovery of criminal assets to the state of Pakistan”, triggering a wide-ranging investigation.
After the Westminster Magistrates Court permitted accounts freezing orders and probe consent to the NCA on 19 December, 2019, Suleman Sharif’s declared Barclays account, Shehbaz Sharif’s HBL UK and Barclays account were immediately probed, seized and monies frozen.
This correspondent has seen court evidence which shows that the NCA’s investigators sought consent from Shehbaz Sharif to have access to his closed Barclays account as well or else the account will be accessed through a production order. Shehbaz Sharif agreed to the consent on advice of his lawyers.
Usually, anti money laundering investigations go back only six years, but in this case, the NCA used its excessive powers and investigated accounts of Shehbaz Sharif and his son dating back around 20 years. The NCA investigators started the probe from the first flat that Shehbaz Sharif bought in 2004 on Edgware Road when he was in exile and asked him to produce evidence of the clean origin of the money, including mortgage payments, source of proceeds in his accounts, salaries and dividends, and full proceeds of property purchase in the UK bought during the exile.
The NCA investigated Suleman Sharif’s Barclays account declared in Pakistan in Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) and looked into all transfers which were made from Pakistan after the State Bank of Pakistan’s approval. The NCA went through each receipt of transfers from the official money exchangers.
The court documents obtained by this correspondent from credible sources demonstrate that the NCA received a letter from the ARU on 11 December, 2019 making allegations of criminal conduct against Shehbaz Sharif and Suleman. The government of Pakistan had requested the UK government to seize all assets and funds of Shehbaz Sharif family, return the same to Pakistan and extradite Suleman Shehbaz with his family.
The Home Office was in the loop and a separate letter was sent to the Home Office asking for extradition of Suleman, as well asking Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) ministry to probe Suleman.
Court papers show that two AFOs were issued by the Westminster Magistrates Court on 17 December for a period of 12 months in case numbers 011902628734 and 011902628947. A year later, on 8 December 2020, the NCA went to the court again, applying to extend both of the AFOs for a period of additional six months, arguing that the investigations were continuing in UK, Dubai and Pakistan. According to court papers, Suleman Shehbaz agreed to the extension of AFOs by the court on three applications made by the NCA.
On 10th September, 2021, the NCA made a unilateral application to the court informing that its investigations had completed and the NCA crime investigators had found no evidence of money-laundering, fraud or wrongdoings in any of the transactions made either from Pakistan to the UK or from the UK to Pakistan in accounts of Suleman and Shehbaz Sharif. The District Judge Nicholas Rimmer signed the final order setting aside the AFOs, releasing and returning the accounts and monies to Suleman Shehbaz and his father.
According to a chronological order of the sensitive investigation - kept under tight wraps by the Sharifs, the NCA and the Pakistan government - a senior director of the NCA’s International Corruption Unit met Shehzad Saleem, Director General of NAB Lahore, in London on Monday 9 December, 2019 to discuss the formal investigation against Shehbaz and Suleman Sharif. According to court papers, Shehzad Saleem explained to the NCA that Shehbaz Sharif’s wealth began to accumulate when he and his brother Nawaz Sharif gained prominence in the 1980’s. The implication being that they were receiving bribes and other kickbacks because of their position in the society.
The NAB Lahore official told the NCA official during their Central London meeting that Sharifs’ used hawala system to transfer monies to make these clean and to legalise such transactions. He told the NCA that NAB’s investigation had identified a large number of remittances to bank accounts of the family allegedly from Pakistanis living abroad.
It is therefore the NAB’s case, he told the NCA, and that the remittances are the laundering of illicit funds by, or on behalf of, Shehbaz Sharif and family, according to court papers.
This correspondent has reviewed the letter of 11h December 2019 from ARU to NCA explaining why Shehbaz and Suleman Sharif should be investigated and what action should be taken. The ARU told the NCA that Shehbaz was wanted in Pakistan, under investigation, on bail, and a person of interest for misuse of authority during his tenure as chief minister Punjab, namely in his involvement in the Ashiana Housing scheme case and Hamza Sugar Mills case.
The Assets Recovery Unit (ARU) said in the same letter that Suleman was the “principal accused and beneficiary of the fake international remittances and money laundering through front and paper companies”. Pakistan government letter to the UK’s anti-corruption agency alleged that its investigation revealed that Shehbaz Sharif and Suleman “patronised a local network of front companies in the name of their low paid employees to launder their proceeds of corruption to show as legitimate money” and that both had “used informal money transfers (hawala) to shift and conceal their money abroad”.
The Pakistan government further told the NCA that Panamagate investigations had “already culminated in sentences to Nawaz Sharif, Maraym Nawaz Sharif and others from the accountability court and these cases are presently pending with the Islamabad High Court in appellate jurisdiction. It mentioned that investigations by NAB are presently underway for “corruption and organised money laundering” in relation to various members of the Sharif family, including Nawaz Sharif, Maryam Nawaz, Hamza Sharif, Shehbaz Sharif, Ishaq Dar, Nusrat Shehbaz, Suleman Sharif and mainly family members of Shehbaz Sharif for “money laundering “through companies owned by Shehbaz’s family members.
This correspondent has seen the full file which the NCA placed before the Westminster Magistrates Court in order to get accounts freezing orders (AFOs) against Shehbaz Sharif and Suleman. The NCA bundle went into detail to describe Shehbaz and his son as being allegedly involved in criminal conduct through misuse of authority and associated money laundering. It relied on several newspaper clippings which carried allegations of money laundering, quoting Pakistan government ministers and their press conferences including attaching an article by David Rose for Daily Mail on 13 July 2019 in which the paper alleged that Shehbaz had stolen the UK government funds. The article carried the same allegations of money laundering that the ARU later on submitted before the NCA, asking the UK to rely on the article for its investigations.
The NCA gained AFOs and probe consent order for violations contrary to sections 327, 328 and 329 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, involving criminal offending contrary to conspiracy to commit misconduct in a public office and conspiracy to cheat the public revenue; concealing criminal property; acquisition of criminal property; use and possessions of criminal property; and fraud by false representation and fraud by abuse of position. The NCA lawyers, requesting freezing orders for 12 months, added: “This will ultimately allow us to prove or disprove if these funds in whole or part, constitute recoverable property in that they are derived from criminal conduct or intended for use in unlawful conduct.”
The NCA application, quoting the allegations made by ARU, said that it needed 12 months because it will conduct enquiries internationally.
The credible legal sources here shared that the grounds of suspicion on which the NCA filed its application in the Westminster Magistrates Court to secure freezing orders were not proven as the investigations in multiple jurisdictions couldn’t establish evidence to prove money-laundering and criminal conduct.
That’s the sole reason, according to the sources, why the NCA gave it in writing to the Westminster Magistrates Court that its investigations had established that there was no case for the “recoverable property”, hence the unfreezing of assets and closure of case file.
Meanwhile, Adviser to the Prime Minister on Accountability Shahzad Akbar said that reports of Shahbaz Sharif being acquitted by the British court were incorrect, clarifying that neither had the ARU nor NAB requested the UK government to initiate a probe against the PML-N leader.
He said the inquiry had been initiated over a "suspicious transaction" that a bank had reported to the NCA, adding that these consisted of certain funds transferred by Suleman Shahbaz from Pakistan to the UK in 2019.
"[These transactions] were declared as a suspicious transaction by the UK authorities and the NCA secured an asset freezing order(AFO) from the court against these funds," he tweeted. "However, recently the NCA decided to stop investigating these funds and therefore agreed for the release of these funds through the court.
"It is clarified that such a release order is not an acknowledgement that funds are from a legitimate source," he added. The prime minister'a aide said that Shahbaz and Suleman have not been acquitted since they had not been tried to begin with.
"The funds were frozen by the NCA and the NCA has decided to not investigate these funds anymore," he added. "Suleman Shahbaz remains a fugitive in a money laundering case against him and his father before the AC Lahore," he added.
The PMLN Secretary Information Marriyum Aurangzeb said the UK court decision has unequivocally exonerated Shehbaz Sharif and his family of all malicious and vexatious claims of corruption and money laundering. Responding to Shahzad Akbar’s tweet, she said the NCA UK conducted a 21-month global investigation spanning across 20 years whilst overcoming unprecedented jurisdictional challenges. She said never in the history of Pakistan such a public office holder has been subjected to global scrutiny and multi-jurisdictional probing. Marriyum said false corruption narrative was exposed, and the government was telling hundred more lies to cover up thousands already told. She said the government will fall on the weight of its own deceit and lies.
At the outset of the hearing, the FIA requested the court to grant Toor’s remand for nine days, which was opposed by...
Reconstruction of this school was scheduled to be completed within eight months with Rs16 million funds but contractor...
On Saturday, Germany called it an apparent act of eavesdropping and said it was investigating
Trump barely referenced Haley during his remarks at a larger rally in Greensboro, training his fire almost solely on...
Batting first, Multan Sultans scored 189 for three. Kings managed 169 for seven in response
The protests began in early February with hundreds of farmers in Punjab aiming to take their campaign to Delhi