SHC tells mobile food delivery company to abide by agreement
The Sindh High Court has directed a mobile food delivery company to abide by the terms and conditions of a strategic partnership agreement with regard to the provision of academic services to students.
The interim order came on a lawsuit filed by Coded Minds against the termination of the strategic partnership contract by the food delivery company.
Plaintiff counsel Mohammad Ahmed Pansota submitted that the plaintiff entered into an agreement with the defendant company to provide academic services curriculum, leading kits (if required) and teachers from KG-I to grade 8 in the subjects of science, technology, English, mathematics, Islamiat and Urdu.
The counsel submitted that the company was to provide the student body at least up to 1,00,000 students and pay Rs18,000 annually per student for the entire year to the plaintiff, while an operational timeline was agreed between the parties, and that was an integral part of the agreement.
He said that plaintiff developed the curriculum and the teachers training certification for the project by spending a hefty amount of $262,500 and the defendant staff were in touch with each other through their employees and a memorandum of understanding was also signed between them for PR stint. He told the court that the company backed out from the agreement and flatly refused to act upon the agreement without assigning any reasons.
The counsel submitted that there had been no termination and settlement discussions going on between the plaintiff and the defendant. He said the refusal to act upon the agreement caused a huge loss to the plaintiff for the amount already invested by the plaintiff.
The court was requested to direct the defendant to pay $ 4 million to the plaintiff for the first three phase students and perform their obligations as per terms of the agreement and to restrain it from entering into an agreement with any other entity for the education of its employees.
A single bench headed by Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, after the preliminary hearing of the lawsuit, issued notices to the defendant food delivery company, and in the meantime directed the defendant to abide by the terms and conditions of the subject agreements in its letter and spirit.
The court also restrained the defendant from entering into any fresh agreement relating to the same subject matter with any third party or to take any adverse action against its employees who were appointed pursuant to the agreement till the next date of hearing.
-
Reese Witherspoon Issues Urgent Warning After Scammers Using Her Identity -
XAI Restricts Grok Image Editing After Backlash From California And Europe -
‘Disgraced’ Andrew’s Past Scandals Catch Up To His Daughters -
Amazon Rolls Out ‘sovereign’ EU-based Cloud To Address Data Privacy Concerns -
Ross, Matt Duffer Used AI To Write Finale Of 'Stranger Things'? -
Microsoft Secures Largest Ever Soil Carbon Credit Agreement Amid Data Centres Expansion -
Google Expands Gemini With Personal Intelligence -
Japan, Philippines Sign Defence Pacts As Regional Tensions Escalate -
ISS Crew Of Four Completes Medical Evacuation With Safe Splashdown Off California -
Connor Storrie Reveals Why His Dad Hasn't Seen 'Heated Rivalry' Yet -
Meghan Markle’s Biggest Challenge In UK Return As She Struggles To Control Narrative -
Princess Beatrice, Eugenie Angry As King Charles Ends Their Financial Security -
Chase Infiniti Shares Her Working Experience With Leonardo DiCaprio -
Todd Bridges And Wife Bettijo B. Hirschi Separate After Three Years Of Marriage -
Germany Sends Troops To Greenland Amid Rising Arctic Tensions -
Jonathan Quick, The New York Rangers Face Mounting Pressure As Losses Pile Up