SHC tells mobile food delivery company to abide by agreement
The Sindh High Court has directed a mobile food delivery company to abide by the terms and conditions of a strategic partnership agreement with regard to the provision of academic services to students.
The interim order came on a lawsuit filed by Coded Minds against the termination of the strategic partnership contract by the food delivery company.
Plaintiff counsel Mohammad Ahmed Pansota submitted that the plaintiff entered into an agreement with the defendant company to provide academic services curriculum, leading kits (if required) and teachers from KG-I to grade 8 in the subjects of science, technology, English, mathematics, Islamiat and Urdu.
The counsel submitted that the company was to provide the student body at least up to 1,00,000 students and pay Rs18,000 annually per student for the entire year to the plaintiff, while an operational timeline was agreed between the parties, and that was an integral part of the agreement.
He said that plaintiff developed the curriculum and the teachers training certification for the project by spending a hefty amount of $262,500 and the defendant staff were in touch with each other through their employees and a memorandum of understanding was also signed between them for PR stint. He told the court that the company backed out from the agreement and flatly refused to act upon the agreement without assigning any reasons.
The counsel submitted that there had been no termination and settlement discussions going on between the plaintiff and the defendant. He said the refusal to act upon the agreement caused a huge loss to the plaintiff for the amount already invested by the plaintiff.
The court was requested to direct the defendant to pay $ 4 million to the plaintiff for the first three phase students and perform their obligations as per terms of the agreement and to restrain it from entering into an agreement with any other entity for the education of its employees.
A single bench headed by Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, after the preliminary hearing of the lawsuit, issued notices to the defendant food delivery company, and in the meantime directed the defendant to abide by the terms and conditions of the subject agreements in its letter and spirit.
The court also restrained the defendant from entering into any fresh agreement relating to the same subject matter with any third party or to take any adverse action against its employees who were appointed pursuant to the agreement till the next date of hearing.
-
Eric Dane's Girlfriend Janell Shirtcliff Pays Him Emotional Tribute After ALS Death -
King Charles Faces ‘stuff Of The Nightmares’ Over Jarring Issue -
Sarah Ferguson Has ‘no Remorse’ Over Jeffrey Epstein Friendship -
A$AP Rocky Throws Rihanna Surprise Birthday Dinner On Turning 38 -
Andrew Jokes In Hold As BAFTA Welcomes Prince William -
Sam Levinson Donates $27K To Eric Dane Family Fund After Actor’s Death -
Savannah Guthrie Mother Case: Police Block Activist Mom Group Efforts To Search For Missing Nancy Over Permission Row -
Dove Cameron Calls '56 Days' Casting 'Hollywood Fever Dream' -
Prince William, Kate Middleton ‘carrying Weight’ Of Reputation In Epstein Scandal -
Timothée Chalamet Compares 'Dune: Part Three' With Iconic Films 'Interstellar', 'The Dark Knight' & 'Apocalypse Now' -
Little Mix Star Leigh-Anne Pinnock Talks About Protecting Her Children From Social Media -
Ghislaine Maxwell Is ‘fall Guy’ For Jeffrey Epstein, Claims Brother -
Timothee Chalamet Rejects Fame Linked To Kardashian Reality TV World While Dating Kylie Jenner -
Sarah Chalke Recalls Backlash To 'Roseanne' Casting -
Pamela Anderson, David Hasselhoff's Return To Reimagined Version Of 'Baywatch' Confirmed By Star -
Willie Colón, Salsa Legend, Dies At 75