SHC seeks comments on plea against quota in CSS exams
The Sindh High Court has directed the establishment secretary, Federal Public Service Commission (FPSC) and others to file comments on a petition against the quota system in the Central Superior Services (CSS) competitive exams.
Petitioner M Tariq Masoor submitted in the petition that the period prescribed in the first proviso of the Article 27(1) of the Constitution for reserving posts for persons belonging to any class or area to secure their adequate representation in the services in Pakistan had expired long ago but the said proviso was being still applied to persons applying for the posts in the services of Pakistan.
The petitioner submitted that such restriction was discriminatory and contrary to the fundamental rights guaranteed by the constitution to the citizens of Pakistan to join the services of the country.
He submitted that the period of 40 years contained in the first proviso to the Clause (1) of the Article 27 had already been expired in 2013; however, subsequent CSS exams taken by the FPSC since 2014 till the last year were based on the earlier which was a violation of the constitution.
He submitted that the quota system was still illegally and unlawfully applicable to specific areas such as determining the share of various areas in appointments in bureaucracy through the competitive examination. He submitted that the federal government issued a notification with regard to holding of CSS competitive exams without amending the rules for open merit system throughout the country.
The high court was requested to declare that quota system as per rules in the CSS competitive exams was against the scheme and structure of the constitution, which provided equal opportunity of employment to all the citizens, and direct the federal government to amend the CSS exams rules for the forthcoming exam to base it on open merit.
A federal law officer sought time to file comments on behalf of the establishment secretary while a representative of the FPSC also requested time to file comments on behalf of the commission.
A division bench of the SHC headed by Justice Mohammad Ali Mazhar granted the requests and directed the federal law officer to file comments by the next date of hearing.
-
Hong Kong Court Sentences Media Tycoon Jimmy Lai To 20-years: Full List Of Charges Explained -
Coffee Reduces Cancer Risk, Research Suggests -
Katie Price Defends Marriage To Lee Andrews After Receiving Multiple Warnings -
Seahawks Super Bowl Victory Parade 2026: Schedule, Route & Seattle Celebration Plans -
Keto Diet Emerges As Key To Alzheimer's Cure -
Chris Brown Reacts To Bad Bunny's Super Bowl LX Halftime Performance -
Trump Passes Verdict On Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Halftime Show -
Super Bowl 2026 Live: Seahawks Defeat Patriots 29-13 To Win Super Bowl LX -
Kim Kardashian And Lewis Hamilton Make First Public Appearance As A Couple At Super Bowl 2026 -
Romeo And Cruz Beckham Subtly Roast Brooklyn With New Family Tattoos -
Meghan Markle Called Out For Unturthful Comment About Queen Curtsy -
Bad Bunny Headlines Super Bowl With Hits, Dancers And Celebrity Guests -
Insiders Weigh In On Kim Kardashian And Lewis Hamilton's Relationship -
Prince William, Kate Middleton Private Time At Posh French Location Laid Bare -
Stefon Diggs Family Explained: How Many Children The Patriots Star Has And With Whom -
‘Narcissist’ Andrew Still Feels ‘invincible’ After Exile