Privatization plans
Once again, talk about privatization is doing the rounds. For the past at least 30 years we have been privatizing state-owned entities in the name of economic restructuring and better management. The neoliberal agenda of international financial institutions (IFI) is never at rest about striking at the root of public properties in developing countries. The mantra holds a usual refrain of public enterprises being inefficient and the need to generate funds to retire debts. But no amount of privatization has been or will be enough to retire all the debts that we have accumulated under the able guidance of the same IFIs which sell structural reforms on one side, and trap countries in monetary muddles on the other. The latest recommendations to the federal cabinet are concerning the privatization of as many as 46 entities.
According to media reports, four departments are to be abolished and four others to be shifted to provinces. IFIs and liberal scholars never tire of promoting privatization as a panacea to the economic troubles of countries such as Pakistan. And debt-ridden countries find themselves in a bind to follow the advice. One wonders after 30 years of privatization how Pakistan has become more efficient or has shown higher productivity. Agreed that some privatized banks offer better customer service in comparison with erstwhile government-owned banks, but this cannot be generalized with other entities.
There has not been sufficient research to guide us about the welfare impact on the people of such privatization processes. Seemingly, the impact is negative as we see higher inequalities in income distribution and increasing poverty. Similarly, nearly all privatization has resulted in increased job losses for people and reduced social welfare. These negative ramifications of privatization must be kept in mind while embarking on a new privatization spree. Economically the government may get some temporary relief with the funds earned through such measures but on the social and welfare fronts this does not result in relief to the common people. The government must consider the possibility of further unemployment as a result of a constricted job market after privatization. Increasing income inequalities will not be good for society and will add to the problems people are already facing.
-
Polar Vortex ‘exceptional’ Disruption: Rare Shift Signals Extreme February Winter -
Which Countries Are Worst And Best In Public Sector AI Race? -
Matthew McConaughey Opens Up About His Painful Battle With THIS -
Emma Stone Reveals She Is ‘too Afraid’ Of Her ‘own Mental Health’ -
China Unveils ‘Star Wars’-like Missile Warship For Space Combat -
King Charles Facing Pressure Inside Palace Over 'Andrew Problem' -
Trump Refuses Apology For Video Depicting Obama As Apes Amid Growing Backlash -
Jesy Nelson Reflects On Leaving Girls' Band Little Mix -
World’s First Pokemon Theme Park Opens In Tokyo, Boosts Japan Tourism -
Waymo Trains Robotaxis In Virtual Cities Using DeepMind’s Genie 3 -
5 Simple Rules To Follow For Smooth, Healthy Hair -
$44 Billion Bitcoin Blunder: Bithumb Exchange Apologizes For Accidental Payout -
Katie Price Ends Public Feud With Ex Peter Andre After 16 Years -
Apple May Bring ChatGPT And Other AI Apps To CarPlay -
Meghan Markle, Prince Harry Likely To Attend Super Bowl Halftime Show 2026 -
AI Next Big Trial: Elon Musk Calls For ‘Galileo Test’ To Prove True Intelligence