Accountability partners
It is an open secret that the United Kingdom has long been a favoured destination for Pakistan’s elite to park their untaxed and unreported wealth – some of it obtained through corruption and other illicit means. Even multiple amnesty schemes – the most recent ending in July – have only brought a small percentage of that wealth into the tax net. The only way an amnesty can work is if those who are guilty of money laundering and evading taxes genuinely fear that the authorities will come after them should they not declare that money. Given the popularity of London as the destination of choice for the corrupt elite, it makes sense for the government to focus its anti-corruption efforts on the UK. And it appears to be doing just that with Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi and UK Home Secretary Sajid Javid announcing last week that they will work together on the return of Pakistani assets, and combating money-laundering. The announcement seems to have been timed to coincide with the arrest just a day later of Farhan Junejo, a close aide of the late Makhdoom Amin Fahim, and his wife. Junejo had been accused of laundering Rs250 million and implicated in a number of corruption scandals. His arrest is the result of a joint investigation between the International Corruption Unit of the UK’s National Crime Agency and our own National Accountability Bureau and Federal Investigative Agency. This shows that there is plenty of scope for cooperation should the government have the will to go after the influential political, business and industrial elite that has parked its wealth abroad.
No one would argue against a partnership with the UK to bring back stolen money but a word of caution is due. Pakistan does not have an extradition treaty with the UK and any decision to extradite Pakistani individuals who are accused of corruption and other crimes will only be done on a case-by-case basis by the British government. That means we need to have solid proof before demanding the extradition of any individual or the seizure of their property. Even judgments by our courts will not be sufficient should the British government believe the cases were politically motivated. That puts the onus on the PTI government to break with the past and not use accountability as a code word for political revenge. If it only goes after its opponents, it may find cooperation from foreign countries is withheld. True accountability will be needed if we are to get back the money that was stolen from the state.
-
Sarah Ferguson Gets Cornered: ‘Bea, Eugenie Are Very Much Under Fergie’s Control’ -
Trump Administration Preparing To Disclose Aliens To Americans: 'They're Real!' -
Martin Scorsese's Daughter Reacts To 'fat, Ugly' Comments After 'Mr & Mrs Smith' Casting -
Kate Mansi Reveals Why She's Leaving Daytime Soap 'General Hospital' -
Memorial Day 2026: Full List Of Stores, Banks And Services Open Or Closed -
Dame Jools Topp, Beloved New Zealand Singer, Dies At 68 -
Lizzo Responds After Fan Accuses Her Of Shading Taylor Swift -
Rubio Warns US Will Seek 'another Way' If Iran Deal Fails -
Beartooth Frontman Caleb Shomo's Wife Ends 14-year Marriage With The Singer -
Pearl Harbor Sailor Identified After 82 Years Through DNA Analysis -
Real Reason Why Christopher Nolan Won’t Work With Nicolas Cage -
Jimmy Kimmel Fires Back At Robert F. Kennedy Jr Amid Stephen Colbert Show Fallout -
Deal Or No Deal? What Is Happening With The Iran-US Talks: An Explainer -
Could AI Replace Pilots? Aviation Industry Tests Next Generation Flight Technology -
Oil Prices Fall As Hopes Rise For US-Iran Peace Deal -
'Michael' Creeps Closer To Highest-grossing Film?