SJC adjourns hearing in Justice Siddiqui case
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) on Tuesday adjourned the hearing to an indefinite period on the complaint filed against the Islamabad High Court (IHC) Judge Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui. A five-member bench of the SJC, headed by Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar, heard the complaint.
Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, Justice Gulzar Ahmed and chief justices of Sindh High Court and Balochistan High Court were the other members of the bench. Raising objection, Justice Siddiqui’s counsel Hamid Khan told the bench that the prosecution witness had not disclosed production of documents in his affidavit, so the same could not be produced in the evidence.
The court asked Attorney General Khalid Javed to identify the documents with the witness that will be produced in the evidence and also exhibit in the record so that the defence counsel may be able to cross-examine it. The attorney general the other day produced before the court the first witness Ali Anwar Gopang, former director maintenance, Capital Development Authority (CDA).
Justice Gulzar Ahmed asked the attorney general as to why he had not sought the help of deputy attorney general to place the documents in order. The attorney general replied that at a time when the instant reference was filed, Maulvi Anwarul Haq, former attorney general, was the main prosecutor in the case. Khalid Javed said he was facing problem for being new in the instant matter.
The chief justice told the attorney general that he should have informed the court in advance. The attorney general further submitted that as he had been appointed by the caretaker government and the new government may appoint another person as attorney general that’s why it would be better to seek the assistance of Maulvi Anwarul Haq, who had prepared the instant case.
He further submitted that Mr. Haq was abroad and expected to return in the first week of August. The court ruled that the proceeding will be fixed for hearing after Maulvi Anwarul Haq’s return and adjourned the proceeding for an indefinite period.
-
King Charles Makes It ‘absolutely Clear’ He Wants To Solve Royal Crisis -
Royal Family Warned To ‘have Answers’ Amid Weak Standing -
Marc Anthony On Why Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Show Mattered -
Kid Rock Gets Honest About Bad Bunny’s Performance At Super Bowl -
Kylie Jenner Reveals Real Story Behind Her 'The Moment' Casting -
Eva Mendes Reveals One Costar She Envied Ryan Gosling Over -
Halsey Marks Fiancé Avan Jogia's Birthday With Emotional Note -
China: Stunning Drone Show Lights Up Night Sky Ahead Of Spring Festival 2026 -
Andrew's Epstein Scandal: Will King Charles Abdicate Following King Edward's Footsteps? -
Billy Joel Leaves Loved Ones Worried With His 'dangerous' Comeback -
Prince William Dodges Humiliating Question In Saudi Arabia -
Dax Shepard Describes 'peaceful' Feeling During Near-fatal Crash -
Steve Martin Says THIS Film Has His Most Funny Scene -
Kensington Palace Shares Update As Prince William Continues Saudi Arabia Visit -
Fugitive Crypto Scammer Jailed For 20 Years In $73m Global Fraud -
Will Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Finally Go To Jail Now That King Charles Has Spoken Out? Expert Answers