IHC declares judgment against regularisation of employees as void
ISLAMABAD: A division bench of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) comprising Justice Athar Minallah and Justice Aamir Farooq here Thursday set aside a judgment of May 29, 2014 of IHC single bench that had declared the recommendations of former PPP government’s sub-committee for regularisation of the contractual and daily wage
By Faisal Kamal Pasha
April 10, 2015
ISLAMABAD: A division bench of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) comprising Justice Athar Minallah and Justice Aamir Farooq here Thursday set aside a judgment of May 29, 2014 of IHC single bench that had declared the recommendations of former PPP government’s sub-committee for regularisation of the contractual and daily wage employees as null and void.
More than 100 employees of different federal government departments had filed an Intra-Court Appeal (ICA) against the judgment that was accepted on Thursday. The ICA was filed against the single bench order and on June 16, 2014 an IHC division bench comprising IHC Chief Justice Muhammad Anwar Khan Kasi and Justice Noorul Haq N Qureshi had suspended the single bench order that had annulled the recommendations for 1,25,000 contractual and daily wage employees of the federal government.
PPP leader Syed Khursheed Shah headed the cabinet’s sub-committee in the previous government.During today’s hearing, IHC division bench in its judgment observed that the services of an employee could only be terminated due to misconduct or fake degree.
IHC bench disposed of the matter after cabinet division told that it had formed a high power committee that would examine cases forwarded to it for regularisation. Any department of federal government could forward cases and this committee would then decide these cases.
Last hearing Cabinet Division Additional Secretary Khusro Pervez had told IHC that federal government had formed a committee that would examine the ongoing regularization of the contractual and daily wage employees. Committee would not only examine the cases of federal government’s contractual and daily wage employees for regularization and it would also examine irregularities in the regularisation process.
Petitioners through their counsel had adopted that the single judge in its order had neither given independent reasons nor assessed arguments of the parties. A cabinet’s sub-committee on July 25, 2012 through similar procedure regularised the services of 150,000 employees and it would be discrimination if the cabinet’s sub-committee’s recommendation for the 1,25,000 employees would not be accepted. Moreover on human level the single bench order would affect lives of around 1,25,000 regular employees.
It is to mention here that IHC single bench comprising Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui on May 29, 2014 directed all the institutions/organisations of the federal government to properly examine and verify record of the regularised employees and only endorse the regularization of those employees who fulfilled the criteria in respect of educational qualification, experience, age and domicile.The ICA was disposed of pursuant to the orders.
More than 100 employees of different federal government departments had filed an Intra-Court Appeal (ICA) against the judgment that was accepted on Thursday. The ICA was filed against the single bench order and on June 16, 2014 an IHC division bench comprising IHC Chief Justice Muhammad Anwar Khan Kasi and Justice Noorul Haq N Qureshi had suspended the single bench order that had annulled the recommendations for 1,25,000 contractual and daily wage employees of the federal government.
PPP leader Syed Khursheed Shah headed the cabinet’s sub-committee in the previous government.During today’s hearing, IHC division bench in its judgment observed that the services of an employee could only be terminated due to misconduct or fake degree.
IHC bench disposed of the matter after cabinet division told that it had formed a high power committee that would examine cases forwarded to it for regularisation. Any department of federal government could forward cases and this committee would then decide these cases.
Last hearing Cabinet Division Additional Secretary Khusro Pervez had told IHC that federal government had formed a committee that would examine the ongoing regularization of the contractual and daily wage employees. Committee would not only examine the cases of federal government’s contractual and daily wage employees for regularization and it would also examine irregularities in the regularisation process.
Petitioners through their counsel had adopted that the single judge in its order had neither given independent reasons nor assessed arguments of the parties. A cabinet’s sub-committee on July 25, 2012 through similar procedure regularised the services of 150,000 employees and it would be discrimination if the cabinet’s sub-committee’s recommendation for the 1,25,000 employees would not be accepted. Moreover on human level the single bench order would affect lives of around 1,25,000 regular employees.
It is to mention here that IHC single bench comprising Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui on May 29, 2014 directed all the institutions/organisations of the federal government to properly examine and verify record of the regularised employees and only endorse the regularization of those employees who fulfilled the criteria in respect of educational qualification, experience, age and domicile.The ICA was disposed of pursuant to the orders.
-
Trump Passes Verdict On Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Halftime Show -
Super Bowl 2026 Live: Seahawks Defeat Patriots 29-13 To Win Super Bowl LX -
Kim Kardashian And Lewis Hamilton Make First Public Appearance As A Couple At Super Bowl 2026 -
Romeo And Cruz Beckham Subtly Roast Brooklyn With New Family Tattoos -
Meghan Markle Called Out For Unturthful Comment About Queen Curtsy -
Bad Bunny Headlines Super Bowl With Hits, Dancers And Celebrity Guests -
Insiders Weigh In On Kim Kardashian And Lewis Hamilton's Relationship -
Prince William, Kate Middleton Private Time At Posh French Location Laid Bare -
Stefon Diggs Family Explained: How Many Children The Patriots Star Has And With Whom -
Shamed Andrew ‘mental State’ Under Scrutiny Amid Difficult Time -
‘Narcissist’ Andrew Still Feels ‘invincible’ After Exile -
Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Halftime Show: What Time Will He Perform Tonight? -
Where Is Super Bowl 2026 Taking Place? Everything To Know About The NFL Showdown -
Chris Pratt Explains Why He And Katherine Schwarzenegger Did Premarital Counseling -
Drake 'turns Down' Chance To Hit Back At Kendrick Lamar At Super Bowl -
Sarah Ferguson Had A ‘psychosexual Network’ With Jeffrey Epstein