Army didn’t directly file FIRs against May 9 accused: SC judge
Bench directed counsel to conclude his arguments within 30 minutes by Wednesday
ISLAMABAD: Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, a judge of the Supreme Court, observed on Tuesday that the accused in the May 9 incidents were charged under the Official Secrets Act, and the army did not directly file any FIRs.
A seven-member Constitutional Bench of the apex court, headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan, heard the Intra-Court Appeals (ICAs) filed by the federal government and the Ministry of Defence against its earlier judgement declaring the trial of civilians in military courts unconstitutional. Other members of the bench were Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Musarrat Hilali, Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan, Justice Syed Hassan Azhar Rizvi, and Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan.
Khwaja Haris, counsel for the Ministry of Defence, continued his rebuttal arguments. The bench directed the counsel to conclude his arguments within 30 minutes by Wednesday.
Justice Aminuddin noted that the attorney general would be heard on Wednesday after Khwaja Haris concludes his submissions. During the hearing, Justice Mazhar observed that the Army Act also grants certain fundamental rights, adding that Rangers and FC personnel approach the service tribunal if dismissed.
Justice Mandokhail questioned whether police and Rangers have their own separate courts. “In the police, does the IG hear appeals, or does the SP conduct cases?” Justice Mandokhail asked, adding that in India, independent forums are available.
He emphasized that a person cannot be arrested without an FIR nor detained without a magistrate’s order. Justice Mazhar, however, noted that the accused in the May 9 incidents were charged under the Official Secrets Act. “The army did not file any FIRs directly,” Justice Mazhar remarked, adding that civilians were handed over to the military through anti-terrorism courts. “Whether the custody was correct or not is another debate,” he observed.
Justice Mandokhail remarked that the case would have far-reaching consequences, citing that the F B Ali case was still debated decades later. Meanwhile, Khawaja Haris submitted that if there had been fewer questions from the judges, he would have finished his arguments on Tuesday. Mandokhail promised he won’t ask any more questions.
Later, the court adjourned the hearing for today (Wednesday).
-
Man Convicted After DNA Links Him To 20-year-old Rape Case -
Royal Expert Shares Update In Kate Middleton's Relationship With Princess Eugenie, Beatrice -
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s Leaves King Charles With No Choice: ‘Its’ Not Business As Usual’ -
Dua Lipa Wishes Her 'always And Forever' Callum Turner Happy Birthday -
Police Dressed As Money Heist, Captain America Raid Mobile Theft At Carnival -
Winter Olympics 2026: Top Contenders Poised To Win Gold In Women’s Figure Skating -
Inside The Moment King Charles Put Prince William In His Place For Speaking Against Andrew -
Will AI Take Your Job After Graduation? Here’s What Research Really Says -
California Cop Accused Of Using Bogus 911 Calls To Reach Ex-partner -
AI Film School Trains Hollywood's Next Generation Of Filmmakers -
Royal Expert Claims Meghan Markle Is 'running Out Of Friends' -
Bruno Mars' Valentine's Day Surprise Labelled 'classy Promo Move' -
Ed Sheeran Shares His Trick Of Turning Bad Memories Into Happy Ones -
Teyana Taylor Reflects On Her Friendship With Julia Roberts -
Bright Green Comet C/2024 E1 Nears Closest Approach Before Leaving Solar System -
Meghan Markle Warns Prince Harry As Royal Family Lands In 'biggest Crises' Since Death Of Princess Diana