Punjab RTI Act-2013 falls short of global standards
Model Freedom of Information Law has also been published which provides model for right-to-information law to be adopted by any country
LAHORE: The Right to Information Act 2013 enacted in Punjab lacks three important aspects, due to which the Act does not meet the criteria of the United Nations Access to Information Agenda and Article 19 of the Universal Declaration for which urgent legislation is required.
According to documents obtained by “Jang”, the United Nations Access to Information Agenda and Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a universal declaration that sets a standard for the protection of freedom of expression. The Model Freedom of Information Law has also been published which provides a model for a right to information law to be adopted by any country. The Model Freedom of Information Law, any person is allowed to file an application. The purpose of this inclusion is to extend the right to information to a wide range of people whereas the Punjab Transparency and Right to Information Act 2013 restricts the right of access to information only to citizens, which is more limited in scope than the global model approach. The global model freedom of information laws include the provisions to address annoying repetitive or unreasonable requests. These provisions are intended to prevent abuse of the right to information while balancing the need for transparency. The Punjab Transparency and Right to Information Act, 2013 does not contain specific provisions to deal with abusive or unreasonable requests. This shortcoming can potentially lead to challenges in handling such situations. Whistleblower protection is an important aspect of transparency laws by accessing and making information public under the globally accepted Model Freedom of Information Act. Model laws often include the provisions to protect individuals who disclose information to the public while the existing Right to Information Act in Punjab does not include specific provisions for the protection of whistleblowers. They may be discouraged from divulging information in the public interest.
-
Prince William, Kate Middleton Camp Reacts To Meghan's Friend Remarks On Harry 'secret Olive Branch' -
Daniel Radcliffe Opens Up About 'The Wizard Of Oz' Offer -
Channing Tatum Reacts To UK's Action Against Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor -
Brooke Candy Announces Divorce From Kyle England After Seven Years Of Marriage -
Piers Morgan Makes Meaningful Plea To King Charles After Andrew Arrest -
Sir Elton John Details Struggle With Loss Of Vision: 'I Can't See' -
Epstein Estate To Pay $35M To Victims In Major Class Action Settlement -
Virginia Giuffre’s Brother Speaks Directly To King Charles In An Emotional Message About Andrew -
Reddit Tests AI-powered Shopping Results In Search -
Winter Olympics 2026: Everything To Know About The USA Vs Slovakia Men’s Hockey Game Today -
'Euphoria' Star Eric Made Deliberate Decision To Go Public With His ALS Diagnosis: 'Life Isn't About Me Anymore' -
Toy Story 5 Trailer Out: Woody And Buzz Faces Digital Age -
Andrew’s Predicament Grows As Royal Lodge Lands In The Middle Of The Epstein Investigation -
Rebecca Gayheart Unveils What Actually Happened When Ex-husband Eric Dane Called Her To Reveal His ALS Diagnosis -
What We Know About Chris Cornell's Final Hours -
Scientists Uncover Surprising Link Between 2.7 Million-year-old Climate Tipping Point & Human Evolution