Punjab RTI Act-2013 falls short of global standards
Model Freedom of Information Law has also been published which provides model for right-to-information law to be adopted by any country
LAHORE: The Right to Information Act 2013 enacted in Punjab lacks three important aspects, due to which the Act does not meet the criteria of the United Nations Access to Information Agenda and Article 19 of the Universal Declaration for which urgent legislation is required.
According to documents obtained by “Jang”, the United Nations Access to Information Agenda and Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a universal declaration that sets a standard for the protection of freedom of expression. The Model Freedom of Information Law has also been published which provides a model for a right to information law to be adopted by any country. The Model Freedom of Information Law, any person is allowed to file an application. The purpose of this inclusion is to extend the right to information to a wide range of people whereas the Punjab Transparency and Right to Information Act 2013 restricts the right of access to information only to citizens, which is more limited in scope than the global model approach. The global model freedom of information laws include the provisions to address annoying repetitive or unreasonable requests. These provisions are intended to prevent abuse of the right to information while balancing the need for transparency. The Punjab Transparency and Right to Information Act, 2013 does not contain specific provisions to deal with abusive or unreasonable requests. This shortcoming can potentially lead to challenges in handling such situations. Whistleblower protection is an important aspect of transparency laws by accessing and making information public under the globally accepted Model Freedom of Information Act. Model laws often include the provisions to protect individuals who disclose information to the public while the existing Right to Information Act in Punjab does not include specific provisions for the protection of whistleblowers. They may be discouraged from divulging information in the public interest.
-
Meghan Trainor's Kids 'over The Moon' After Welcoming Baby Mikey -
Taylor Swift, Blake Lively's Text Messages Revealed -
Queen Camilla Tugs At Heartstrings By Talking About Cancer And Not Needing To ‘pretend’ -
North West Skips Traditional School As Kim Kardashian Explains Why -
Prince Harry Claims Media Has ‘no Limits’ In Light Of Diana Death -
Andrew Inches To The Point Of No Return As He Loses What Little He Had Remaining As The King’s Brother -
Inside Meghan Markle’s Recipe Drop After Netflix Decides Against ‘With Love, Meghan’ Season 3 -
Brooklyn Beckham’s Pre-nup Details, Secrets And Divorce Settlement Comes To Light -
Royal Camp Is Focused On Fighting Against ‘Harry Distractions:’ Expert -
Andrew’s Gun License Turns Into The Final Straw? ‘To Him There’s Nothing Left Worth Getting Out Of Bed For’ -
Kim Kardashian Shares One Regret She Wishes Had Not Happened -
Why Blake Lively Claims 'It Ends With Us' 'nearly Killed' Her? -
Brooklyn Beckham’s Statement Gets Run Over: ‘You Wouldn’t Have Any Of This Yourself’ -
Princess Beatrice Follows Eugenie Into Anguish As Their ‘York Greek Tragedy’ Threatens Family Further -
Prince Harry Urges His Pals Are ‘not Leaky,’ He Is Not ‘Mr Mischief’ -
What Prince William And Kate Think Of Brooklyn's Attack On Victoria And David Beckham?