Constitution, law can’t run on whims of a ‘Satan’: Marriyum
ISLAMABAD: Minister for Information and Broadcasting Marriyum Aurangzeb on Thursday said that the decision of the Election Commission of Pakistan to postpone the Punjab Assembly elections was in the interest of Pakistan.
In a tweet she said: “The Constitution an law cannot run on whims of a Satan that whenever he likes break the Constitution, dissolve the assembly, smash policemen’s heads, attack the election commission, assault court. Whatever decision he wants is delivered.”
"The Election Commission took the decision keeping in mind the economic, political and security situation", she said in a statement.
The minister said that the ECP had saved the country from a big constitutional crisis and this decision would bring political stability in the country.
Marriyum maintained that under Article 218 of the Constitution, the ECP has to ensure transparent, impartial and fair elections.
Article 224 required that at the time of elections, caretaker governments should be established at the federal and provincial level, she maintained.
The minister stated that the Election Commission took this decision after consulting all of the stakeholders.
There were reservations that because of one man's ego, elections were being forced on two provinces, she said.
If elections in two provinces were held on April 30, it would have created a controversy for forever as the terms of Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa assemblies would have ended six months before National Assembly and other two provincial assemblies.
The process of the census is going on in the country and it was not possible to hold elections in two provinces before the census and in in other provinces after the census.
Castigating Imran Khan, she said the Constitution cannot act on the whims of one person who could violate it anytime, dissolve the assembly whenever he wants.
She said Imran Khan instigated his followers to injure the law enforcement agencies personnel, attack the ECP and storm the court premises.
She said one person could not dictate when the election should be held, and when the decisions should be made.
-
Prince Harry Mentions Ex-girlfriend Chelsy Davy In UK Court -
David, Victoria Beckham 'quietly' Consulting Advisers After Brooklyn Remarks: 'Weighing Every Move' -
Meta's New AI Team Delivered First Key Models -
Prince Harry Defends Friends In London Court -
AI May Replace Researchers Before Engineers Or Sales -
Christina Haack Goes On Romantic Getaway: See With Whom -
Consumers Spend More On AI And Utility Apps Than Mobile Games: Report -
Aircraft Tragedy: Missing Tourist Helicopter Found Near Japan Volcano Crater -
Taylor Swift Lands In Trouble After Blake Lively Texts Unsealed -
'Prince Harry Sees A Lot Of Himself In Brooklyn Beckham' -
Kate Middleton’s Cancer Journey Strengthens Her Commitment To Helping Children -
Gaten Matarazzo Compares 'Stranger Things' Ending To 'Lord Of The Rings' -
Prince Harry Slams Publisher Over 'dirty Trick' Ahead Of Showing Evidence -
Blueface Promises To Change Behaviour If His Ex Comes Back -
Prince Harry Makes Crucial Promise To Meghan Markle Over UK Return -
Keir Starmer’s China Visit: UK Follows Mark Carney In Major Reset Of Ties