close
Saturday March 02, 2024

News Analysis: What is PTI’s defence in assets hiding case against Imran?

March 18, 2023
Former prime minister Imran Khan. Photo courtesy Instagram imrankhan.pti
Former prime minister Imran Khan. Photo courtesy Instagram imrankhan.pti

KARACHI: The PTI legal team has two main planks of defence in the false declaration of assets case in which PTI Chairman Imran Khan is set to make his first personal appearance today in a district and sessions court in Islamabad.

Legal experts say that the defence put up by the PTI team can be termed a defence on technicalities -- as opposed to defence on merits. The technicality being used by the PTI counsel is that under Section 137 of the Election Act, 2017 criminal action on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities that Imran was supposed to submit is to be initiated within a period of 120 days from the date the statement of assets and liabilities has been filed. The PTI legal team’s argument is that the statute of limitation for the filing of criminal proceedings had passed.

The second plank the PTI legal team has focused on is that the district election commissioner -- who is the complainant in the trial court case -- has no authority to file complaint from the ECP and that there is no authority letter annexed with the complaint [filed in the court]. The EC’s counsel during the hearings said the commissioner was authorized to file the criminal complaint.

By most accounts, the legal battleground for the trial court hearing will likely be the first plank of defence by the PTI team -- the statute of limitations argument.

The district and sessions court was moved for criminal proceedings against Imran Khan by the ECP after its verdict that had found Imran to have engaged in “corrupt acts” -- under Sections 167 and 173 of the Elections Act of 2017 -- by making false declarations. Legal experts also point out that today’s hearing in effect has little to do with the ‘Toshakhana’ tag and is a case of ‘corrupt practices’ -- of hiding assets. In Imran’s case, those assets happen to be those he got from the Toshakhana. Lawyers say that once an asset has been obtained -- paying whatever amount -- that asset becomes the property of a person and counts in one’s assets and liabilities. As such, all these assets need to be declared.