Royal experts fear the aftereffects of the ‘dangerous precedent’ Meghan Markle’s court case win is setting.
This claim’s been made by media lawyer Matthew Dando, during his interview with Express royal editor Richard Palmer.
There he was quoted saying, “This is a troubling judgement which has very concerning consequences for freedom of expression.”
“By preventing key evidence being heard regarding the preparation of the Duchess’ letter and its intended audience, the Court of Appeal has presumptively elevated the Duchess’ privacy rights over matters of public interest and freedom of expression.”
“This decision heightens concerns that privacy laws permit public figures selectively to determine what can be reported about them and manipulate the media narrative.”
“It also sets a dangerous precedent that anyone arguing against that status quo may not even be entitled properly to test the claimant’s evidence in court.”
Jamie Lynn Spears and Jamie Watson's journey to happily ever after
Taylor Swift confirms 'The Tortured Poets Department' will push limits with explicit themes
Ryan Gosling, Eva Mendes have been together for more than a decade but kept their relation private
George Clooney shares his thoughts on direction and acting while promoting his directorial venture
Travis Kelce's team Kansas City Chiefs' kicker opens up on meeting Taylor Swift
Olivia Munn opens up about breast cancer battle after negative genetic test results