Ilhan Omar incident did not happen in a vacuum, Muslim advocates say
The Council on American-Islamic Relations said Omar was targeted by a man who sprayed an unknown substance at her
A Muslim civil rights organization says an attack on Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar during a town hall event reflects a broader pattern of hate and rhetoric directed at the congresswoman.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations said Omar was targeted by a man who sprayed an unknown substance at her while she was speaking.
In a statement released after the incident, the group said the attack “did not happen in a vacuum” and pointed to years of hostile language aimed at the Democratic lawmaker.
CAIR, the largest Muslim advocacy organisation in the United States, said Omar has been “the frequent target of anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant and anti-Somali hate rhetoric.”
“We condemn this assault in the strongest possible terms and call for enhanced security for Congresswoman Omar, her family and her community,” said Jaylani Hussein, executive director of CAIR’s Minnesota chapter.
“When a sitting member of Congress is relentlessly demonized through false anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant rhetoric, violence becomes a predictable outcome.”
CAIR’s statement also referenced recent remarks by President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly targeted Omar.
The president recently referred to the congresswoman as “garbage,” and said Somalis should go back to where they came from.
-
Christa Pike 'feels connection' with Lindsay Clancy ahead of her execution
-
FBI faces internal criticism after hackers steal sensitive employee data
-
Argentina threatens UK with international legal action over Falkland Islands oil exploration
-
Trump says ICE can arrest migrants without criminal records
-
Tennessee prepares to execute first female inmate in more than two centuries
-
Estonia says Russia behind ‘sabotage’ attack on Ukraine defence supplier in Tallinn
-
Russia’s corporate crackdown widens with new message to EU businesses
-
Ex-special counsel says he would prosecute Trump again based on same evidence
