SHC sets aside man’s death sentence in triple murder case
The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Monday set aside the death sentence of a banned militant outfit’s activist in a triple murder case observing that the prosecution had failed to prove charges against him.
Ishaque, alias Bobby, was sentenced to death by an anti-terrorism court (ATC) for murdering Syed Zakir Hussain, Mohammad Nawaz and Muhammad Younus at Dargah Nazar Ali Shah in Korangi on August 23, 2014.
According to the prosecution, Bobby along with an absconding accomplice had fired at the victims and a 12- to 13-year-old boy who remained unhurt and ran away from the scene. The suspect had been on the run until his arrest in November 2016.
A counsel for the appellant submitted that the prosecution had failed to prove charges against him and there was no sufficient evidence to convict the appellant in the triple murder case. He submitted that the identification parade of the appellant could not be relied upon as there was contradiction in the statement of a witness.
An additional prosecutor general supported the trial court’s judgment and sought dismissal of the appeal. A division bench of the high court headed by Justice Mohammad Karim Khan Agha after hearing the arguments and perusal of the evidence observed that the prosecution had failed to prove charges against the appellant as the identification parade for the appellant had not been conducted in accordance with the law.
The SHC set aside the death sentence of the appellant and ordered his release if not required in other cases.
Plea for autopsy
The SHC also dismissed a petition seeking the exhumation of the late Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf MNA Dr Aamir Liaquat Hussain’s body for an autopsy.
The petitioner, Abdul Ahad, had submitted in the application that Hussain was a renowned person and his cause of death should be ascertained.
A counsel for Hussain’s children opposed the petition submitting that he had no locus standi to file the petition. He argued that Hussain had died on June 9 and his legal heirs were allowed to bury him after obtaining permission from a judicial magistrate. He submitted that the legal heirs of the deceased did not want an autopsy of their father and requested the high court to dismiss the petition.
A single bench of the high court headed by Justice Salahuddin Panhwar after hearing the arguments of the counsels dismissed the petition.
-
Prince Harry Touches Down In Heathrow For The Witness Box -
Harry’s Turmoil Turns To Agony Over Meghan Markle’s Hope: ‘Time Will Tell If He’ll Bare It’ -
Reese Witherspoon Jokes About Jennifer Garner’s 'dark Side' -
'Lion King' Co-director Roger Allers Breathes His Last At 76 -
Prince Harry’s Security ‘isn’t Just For His Family’: Expert Rewires Security Woe -
Prince Harry Risks Making King Charles Choose Between Queen Camilla And Military Duty -
Kate Hudson Jokes She May Write A Script To Star Alongside This Actress -
Inside How Kate Middleton Stayed Steady Amid Cancer And Royal Chaos -
Kanye West's Wife Bianca Censori Shows Off Hidden Talent -
Kate Middleton Has Learnt Her 'lesson' After 'powering Through' -
Will Prince Harry Be A Working Royal Again For Archie, Lilibet’s Royal Prospects? Expert Answers -
Chile In Danger: Deadly Wildfires Kill 20,forced 50,000 To Flee; President Declares ‘State Of Catastrophe’ -
Prince Harry’s Relationship With King Charles 'changes' With Archie, Lilibet’s UK Doors Opening -
Sara Waisglass Addresses Fans Concerns About Recasting In 'Ginny & Georgia' -
Tim Allen Reflects On Stepping Into Mentorship During 'Home Improvement' Gig -
Royal Tensions Rise As King Charles Navigates Prince Harry, William Feud