SHC restrains police from taking coercive action against JI MPA, activists
The Sindh High Court has restrained police from taking any coercive action against Jamaat-e-Islami MPA and other candidates of the party for the upcoming local bodies elections in Karachi in three FIRs lodged against them pertaining to an unlawful assembly and rioting in Lyari.
MPA Syed Abdul Rasheed and others submitted in a petition that JI activists and residents of the area were peacefully protesting against a lack of civic amenities in Lyari, especially after the recent heavy monsoon rains.
They remarked that continuous protests by the people of Lyari caused embarrassment to the ruling Pakistan Peoples Party, which used state machinery and involved the protesters in false and frivolous cases.
They submitted that police acting on directives of the PPP raided a JI protest camp and arrested the lawmaker and other activists, who had been peacefully registering their protest against the lack of basic amenities in the area. They said they were released after they had been detained at the police station for several hours.
The petitioners said the police had however registered three cases against them at different police stations on July 30 by alleging that they were involved in holding an unlawful assembly and rioting on July 26, 29 and 30.
Their counsel Furrukh Usman said the impugned FIRs showed that there was almost a common concocted story in all the cases, which had been lodged to counter the illegality committed by the police wherein the petitioners were maliciously confined and beaten up during confinement.
He questioned he act of the police working under the Sindh government to dissuade the petitioners and others from contesting the LG elections and to put pressure on them to give up in favour of the candidates fielded by the PPP.
He said it could be examined that the FIRs were registered at three police stations on the same day within a span of one hour regarding identical incidents of blocking a road. The counsel submitted that the petitioners were apprehensive that if they proceeded to hold meetings and canvass people, more FIRs would be registered against them.
The court was requested to quash the FIRs and restrain the police from illegally and indirectly interrupting the election campaign of the petitioners.
A division bench, headed by Justice Mohammad Iqbal Kalhoro, after the preliminary hearing of the petition, issued notices to the advocate general of Sindh, the prosecutor general and others and called their comments on August 30. The court in the meantime restrained the police from taking any coercive action against the petitioners in the FIRs till the next date of the hearing.
-
Andrew's Reasons For Giving Sarah Ferguson A Rent-free Home For 30 Years After Divorce Finally Finds An Answer -
Charlie Puth Reveals Wake-up Moment That Made Him Quit Alcohol -
Meghan Trainor Welcomes Baby Girl Mikey Moon Trainor And Turns Emotional -
Why Keith Urban's Daughters Are Avoiding His Rumored Girlfriend? Source -
Sarah Ferguson Led Andrew To Jeffrey Epstein: ‘She Wanted Him To Ask For More Money’ -
Blake Lively Claimed Justin Baldoni 'made A Monster' Of Her, Court Docs Reveal -
Prince William Accused Of 'harsh Decisions' Over Disgraced Royal -
Dolly Parton Gets Major Surprise On 80th Birthday -
Jennifer Lawrence Revisits Viral Kourtney Kardashian Comment: 'Insane' -
Prince William, Kate Middleton Engage In Fierce Curling Match In Scotland -
Charlie Puth Admits He Was 'very Cringe' During Early Fame -
Prince William’s ‘failed’ Mother Diana Sparks Another Row With Prince Harry: ‘It’s Crossing A Line’ -
Jennifer Garner Reflects On Special Bond With Mark Ruffalo -
King Charles Stuck With Supporting Prince Harry 'great Cause' -
Nicola Peltz Is 'the Issue' In Beckham Drama, Ex Stylist Claims -
Expert Speaks Out On Andrew’s Vicious Circle With Jeffrey Epstein Of Information Trading & Honey Traps