Contempt of court laws do not protect ex-judges from criticism: IHC
ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice of the Islamabad High Court Athar Minallah on Friday rejected a petition filed against the PMLN leaders, declaring it non-maintainable and observed that ‘contempt of court’ laws do not apply on criticism of retired judges, even if they retired as chief justices of the country.
A petition had been moved in the IHC seeking contempt of court proceedings against PMLN Vice President Maryam Nawaz and ex-prime minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi over their statements related to former chief justice Saqib Nisar, Geo TV reported.
Maryam had held a detailed press conference on Wednesday regarding a recently surfaced audio clip
allegedly featuring the retired chief justice issuing directions to wrongfully convict or detain Maryam and PMLN supremo Nawaz Sharif.
Retired chief justice Nisar has already strongly denied that he issued any extra-legal or illegal instructions in any corruption cases against the Sharifs. He has said the audio clip in question has been fabricated and he is contemplating what kind of legal action he will take against it.
After Maryam’s press conference, petitioner Kalsum Khaliq had moved the IHC, arguing that Maryam and Abbasi had tried to scandalise the judiciary through their statements about the retired chief justice. She had asked the court to initiate contempt of court proceedings against both PMLN leaders.
During Friday’s hearing, Justice Athar Minallah noted that the victim, in this case, can claim defamation through the courts. He also remarked that contempt of court laws do not protect from criticism a retired person, even if they are a former chief justice. “First of all, judges are open-minded about criticism. There is no contempt of court for a retired person, even if the person is a former chief justice. Judges are in a very high position and criticism should be welcomed," he said. In the order, the IHC CJ stated that the petitioner was offended over the criticism of the former chief justice.
The IHC said that after retirement, judges are not part of the bench and are common citizens and can approach alternative forums to get justice. “Contempt law can only be used when it is done in the public interest.”
-
Where Is Kris Humphries Now More Than A Decade After 72-day Marriage? -
Keanu Reeves Admits He Uses Motorcycles ‘to Tell Stories’ Around The World -
Robert Pattinson Shares Unexpected Pattern He’s Noticed With Tom Holland -
Zoey Deutch Fawns Over ‘incredibly Warm’ Jennifer Aniston Ahead Of New Movie -
'Marvel' Actress Wai Ching Ho Dies At 82 -
Kate Middleton Finally Sees The Straw That Breaks The Camel’s Back: ‘So Tiresome!’ -
Kate Middleton’s Views On Prince Harry Take A Massive U-turn: ‘She’s Looking At The Sussexes’ Chaos’ -
King Charles Is ‘finally Over It’: Harry Put Archie, Lilibet Meeting In Limbo Despite Fears It May Be ‘too Late’ -
Katie Price Makes First Public Comments After Lee Andrews' Second Arrest In Dubai -
Travis Kelce’s Issues With Taylor Swift’s Team Blows Up -
Bangkok Pub Fire Tragedy: 27 Dead, 63 Injured After Deadly Blaze Engulfs Bar In Chatuchak -
Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Seems ‘traumatised’ During Lonely Summer -
Jelly Roll Confesses Old Habits That Resurfaced After Bunnie XO Divorce -
Kate Middleton Presents Trophy, Awards Winner Of Wimbledon Tennis Championships -
Michael Jackson Biopic Moonwalks Past $1 Billion Despite Mixed Reviews -
King Charles Sets Aside Things Queen Stood For In Order To Appease Harry? ‘So Idiotic!’