SHC issues warrants against board of revenue, land utilisation secretaries
The Sindh High Court on Tuesday took exception to the failure of the secretaries of the board of revenue and land utilisation despite court orders in a land allotment case, and issued bailable warrants against them.
The warrants were issued on a petition of former vice chancellor Dr Zafar Saeed Saify against an encroachment on a land allotted for the purpose of an anti-cancer drug research centre.
The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the court had issued certain directives for the removal of the encroachment and handing over the possession of the land to the petitioner, but the court orders had not been complied with in letter and spirit.
As the matter was taken up before a division bench, headed by Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, both secretaries were called absent.
-
Dolly Parton Marks Major Milestone As State Governor Honors Her Legacy -
Karley Scott Collins Reacts To Rumours Of Her Dating Keith Urban -
Meghan Markle Sends Shockwaves With Promise Of Chaos: ‘Has The Power To Upset The Royals’ -
Jesy Nelson, Zion Foster Call It Quits Amid Twins' Heartbreaking Diagnosis: Source -
What King Charles Told Princess Diana In Letter Before Wedding? -
David Crosby Said This One Singer Had 'no Talent At All' -
Meghan Markle’s Return Risks Setting Off Something ‘exhausting’ And William, Kate Are Bracing -
Bruce Springsteen Reveals Singer He Finds To Be Greatest Rock And Roll Voice -
Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Ensures Teddy Bear Collection Reaches New Home -
Ben Affleck Recalls 'throwing Up' During 'Armageddon's Final Scene -
Kevin Costner Marks 71st Birthday With Decades-old Throwback Photos -
Why Royal Lodge Fell Into Disarray Under Andrew: Insider Exposes Loophole -
Hoda Kotb 'so Proud' As Today 'magic Reignites' With Sheinelle Jones -
Kate Middleton Avoids Nanny Involvmenet In Prince George Matters -
Colin Jost Jokes About Scarlett Johansson Losing Highest-grossing Actor Crown To Zoe Saldana -
‘Traitor’ Prince Harry Has ‘spooked’ His Family: ‘He Has To Pay A Price Of Re-entry’