Naming SHC CJ as ad hoc SC judge: Sindh lawyers to boycott court proceedings today
KARACHI: The legal fraternity on Monday announced to boycott court proceedings on Tuesday over the proposed appointment of Chief Justice of Sindh High Court Justice Ahmed Ali M Sheikh as an ad-hoc judge of the Supreme Court.
Addressing a joint press conference at the Sindh Bar Council, SBC members, Sindh High Court Bar Association and Karachi Bar Association representatives expressed their strong grievances and reservation over the proposed appointment of SHC CJ as an ad-hoc judge of SC despite the judge's (CJ SHC ) lack of consent.
The SBC vice chairman, Ziaul Hassan Lanjar, SHCBA President Salahuddin Ahmed and KBA president Naeem Qureshi said the principle of seniority was not being followed in judicial appointments and elevation of high courts judges to the Supreme Court.
They said it seems that Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) had not evolved a set criteria for appointments and elevation of judges to the Supreme Court as sometimes the JCP prefers seniority, at times competence and occasionally the command of a judge over certain nature of cases.
They said that this discrimination was creating rift among the judges as recently witnessed during the hearing of some high-profile cases in the Supreme Court. They said an excuse was being made that in the past, senior high court judges recommended elevation of junior judges.
However, they said, it is now clear that no such consent was ever given by the senior judges for elevation of junior judges. Referring to Article 182 of the Constitution, they said it does not allow even appointment of a chief justice as an ad-hoc judge of SC and only permits a retired SC or HC judge to be so appointed at that position.
They said that if a chief justice was conceived to be a judge of high court, even then the consent of Chief Justice of that province was required under Article 182 (b) of the Constitution. They deplored that if a chief justice was appointed as an ad-hoc judge against his will, it shall set a terrible constitutional precedent and permanently destroy the independence of the high court.
Terming it the creation of a needless constitutional crisis, the bar leaders said it was being done merely because of the insistence of the judicial commission of not adhering to the seniority principle.
The bar leaders and their representatives requested that the Chief Justice of SHC be appointed as a permanent judge of the SC against the available vacancy. They said that the bar will challenge such ad-hoc appointment, if made, before the Supreme Court. The bar leaders also announced boycotting court proceedings on Tuesday (today) throughout the province.
Earlier, a media outlet reported that Justice Ahmed Ali M. Sheikh through his letter of Aug 5 to the JCP had dispelled the impression that he had at any stage either agreed or accorded consent to attending sittings of the Supreme Court as an ad hoc judge.
-
Therapist Killed In Office As Former Client Launches Knife Attack -
Gaten Matarazzo Brands 'Stranger Things' Final Scene 'nerve-racking' -
David Beckham Speaks Out After Son Brooklyn Beckham's Shocking Post -
Sophie Turner Gets Candid About 'imposter Sydrome' Post 'GOT' -
When Nicola Peltz's Boyfriend Anwar Hadid Found Solace In Dua Lipa's Arms -
Claire Foy Reveals Rare Impact Of 'The Crown' Gig On Career -
Megan Thee Stallion Teases New Music On The Way -
Blonde Kate Stuns In Photos With Prince William During Rare Joint Engagement -
Kate Gosselin Reveals Harrowing Moment Thief Nearly Took Her Down -
Billy Bob Thornton Weighs In On Contrast To 'Landman' Role -
Amanda Holden May Swap Position To Different Reality Show: See Which -
The Truth Behind Victoria Beckham's 'inappropriate' Wedding Dance Video -
AI Startup Raises $480 Million At $4.5 Billion Valuation In Earlier Gains -
North Carolina Woman Accused Of Serving Victims With Poisoned Drinks -
Robert Redford’s Daughter Amy Sings Praises Of Late Father -
OpenAI And ServiceNow Team Up To Embed ChatGPT In Business Workflows