PTI, Opp differ on conditions for Nawaz Sharif’s treatment
LAHORE:The PTI leadership has claimed that any condition attached to the exit of former prime minister Nawaz Sharif from the country is in accordance with the law that cannot be changed for a convict.
“Who will guarantee about the return of Nawaz Sharif once he leaves the country, already his sons and relative Ishaq Dar are absconders, surety has to be given,” said Federal Minister Faisal Vawda while talking to The News regarding the government’s decision to attach conditions to the visit of Nawaz Sharif abroad. This is noteworthy that Nawaz Sharif has recently got bail in two cases and he is expected to leave the country for treatment very soon. Vawda, who is one of the Federal Cabinet members who alongwith Ali Amin Gandapur and Ali Zaidi, had opposed the idea of sending Nawaz Sharif out of country without attaching conditions, stating that there had been precedents that other members of Sharif family, after facing conviction from the courts in Pakistan, had not returned to the country. So, he said, it was mandatory for Nawaz to give guarantee of his return within the stipulated time.
Federal Minister Fawad Ch while expressing similar views stated that if a convict had to leave the country for treatment, he had to sign surety bonds for his return and there was nothing confronting the law in it. Leaders from the opposition parties, while expressing different views, said if the government had treated the case of Nawaz on humanitarian grounds, attaching any condition to his tour abroad was a mockery.
“There is no doubt that the government has the prerogative to seek guarantee, but as the citizen of Pakistan I believe it is just meant to irritate a patient about whom it is claimed that his case is being considered on humanitarian grounds,” said Syed Nayyar Hussein Bokhari, former Chairman Senate and Secretary General of Pakistan Peoples Party, while talking to The News.
Farooq H Naek, another former Chairman of Senate and PPP leader, while talking to The News said that once a person had been granted bail from the court, there was no question on part of a government to seek any guarantee from him. He said a court grants bail after receiving surety and once this process had been done, there was no need to repeat it and stated it shouldn’t be done.
-
Queen Elizabeth Tied To Andrew's Sexual Abuse Case Settlement: Report -
Mark Ruffalo Urges Fans To Boycott Top AI Company Boycott -
Prince William Joins Esports Battle In Saudi Arabia -
Princess Beatrice, Eugenie Are Being Ripped Apart: ‘Their Relationship Is Fully Fractured’ -
Arden Cho Shares Update On Search For ‘perfect’ Wedding Dress Ahead Of Italy Ceremony -
Ariana Madix Goes Unfiltered About Dating Life -
Prince William Closes Saudi Arabia Visit With Rare Desert Shot -
'King Charles Acts Fast Or Face Existential Crisis' Over Andrew Scandal -
Brooklyn Beckham Charging Nearly £300 In Ticket Cost For Burger Festival -
Prince William Makes Unexpected Stop At Local Market In Saudi Arabia -
Zayn Malik Shares Important Update About His Love Life -
James Van Der Beek's Celebrity Pals Pen Touching Tribute After His Death -
Kate Middleton, William Are Holding Onto Their Hats As Worse Gets Threatened: Behind The Veil Of Shame -
British Soap Awards Scrapped Again As ITV Confirms 2026 Hiatus -
Climate Nearing Dangerous Tipping Points, Study Shows -
James Van Der Beek, 'Dawson's Creek' Star, Dies At 48