SHC issues notice to govt for restriction on import of used vehicles
KARACHI: Sindh High Court has issued notices to attorney general of Pakistan, ministry of commerce, custom authorities and others on a petition against restriction to import used vehicles under import policy order 2016.
The notices were issued on the petition of citizen who challenged the import policy order 2016 pleading that citizens are facing difficulties to import used vehicles. The petitioner's counsel Syed Shayan Ahmed submitted that import and export was regulated through Import and Export (Control) Act wherein in terms of section 3 (1) giving unfettered powers to the federal government to prohibit and control the import and export of goods. He submitted the provisions are ultra vires the Constitution and violative of dichotomy of powers between the executive and the Parliament.
The counsel submitted that condition no V of serial 10 appendix –C to import policy order 2016, the import of used vehicles is banned for a citizen and who could import them only under personal baggage scheme, transfer of residence scheme and gifts by overseas Pakistanis, which is also violative of the fundamental right of the citizens to import vehicles of their choice. He submitted that such restrictions were incorporated by Ministry of Industries and Production, instead of the Ministry of Commerce to give undue advantage to the selected local manufacturing automobile industry in violation of section 3 of competitive Act 2010.
The counsel submitted that discrimination is so obvious that the local manufacturers exercising monopoly on the production of vehicles deliberately do not manufacture the required number of vehicles to meet the demand of over 300,000 cars annually and instead produce about 184,000 vehicles a year despite the capacity to create an artificial deficit which results in their purchase by an additional amount of premium for an early delivery of the vehicle.
Besides, the import of used vehicle is not being properly regulated deliberately to the disadvantage of the public at large. Against the backdrop of the arguments, the court issued notices to attorney general of Pakistan, ministry of commerce, custom authorities and others and called their comments on June 17.
-
Winter Olympics 2026: Top Contenders Poised To Win Gold In Women’s Figure Skating -
Inside The Moment King Charles Put Prince William In His Place For Speaking Against Andrew -
Will AI Take Your Job After Graduation? Here’s What Research Really Says -
California Cop Accused Of Using Bogus 911 Calls To Reach Ex-partner -
AI Film School Trains Hollywood's Next Generation Of Filmmakers -
Royal Expert Claims Meghan Markle Is 'running Out Of Friends' -
Bruno Mars' Valentine's Day Surprise Labelled 'classy Promo Move' -
Ed Sheeran Shares His Trick Of Turning Bad Memories Into Happy Ones -
Teyana Taylor Reflects On Her Friendship With Julia Roberts -
Bright Green Comet C/2024 E1 Nears Closest Approach Before Leaving Solar System -
Meghan Markle Warns Prince Harry As Royal Family Lands In 'biggest Crises' Since Death Of Princess Diana -
Elon Musk Weighs Parenthood Against AI Boom, Sparking Public Debate -
'Elderly' Nanny Arrested By ICE Outside Employer's Home, Freed After Judge's Order -
Keke Palmer On Managing Growing Career With 2-year-old Son: 'It's A Lot' -
Key Details From Germany's Multimillion-euro Heist Revealed -
David E. Kelley Breaks Vow To Cast Wife Michelle Pfeiffer In 'Margo's Got Money Troubles'