Monday June 24, 2024

Fringe power?

By Fahd Humayun
April 03, 2016

As large tracts of Iraq and Syria hover between Westphalian meltdown and militant takeover, policy pathways for Pakistan in the Middle East are piloted by Islamabad’s foreign policy equation with Saudi Arabia, even as the current leadership earns accolades for attempting to mediate a difficult Riyadh-Tehran standoff. The mixed messages sent out by Pakistan’s official high-level participation in Operation North Thunder in the deserts of the Saudi-Iraq border this month, while choosing to stay the course by staying out of the war in Yemen, shows that the fog surrounding Islamabad’s Saudi policy has yet to lift.

This is unhelpful and worrisome, given recent events. While a negotiated end to the war in Syria is still a long way off, the new bloc formations are dangerous destabilisers that will undercut attempts to find mutuallyacceptable solutions to the regional fighting. At a time when rudderless nations can benefit from statesmanship and direction, Riyadh’s exclusion of Iraq, Syria and Iran from participation in Operation North Thunder speaks to a Saudi foreign policy that remains exclusionary – retrogressing back to an alliance system that divides more than it unites.

Five years since the Arab Spring, the regional premium on hard power as the foreign policy commodity of choice has resulted in important new realities in the Middle East. This includes a depression in Saudi Arabia’s international stock, fostered by dwindling oil prices and matched by the dawn of a more self-assured, globally savvy Iran. But as Iran goes from underdog to heavyweight, its rise will only increase Riyadh’s insecurity and regional vexations.

Iran has over three times the population, a much stronger industrial base as compared to Saudi Arabia and a powerful military with twice as many soldiers. This, in turn, is compelling Riyadh to project its power in a more assertive and militarised way – as evidenced by the ongoing intervention in Yemen, tactical moves to shore up the Al-Nusra Front, the staging of multi-nation war exercises in the region and, most recently, the execution of a Shia cleric, all to communicate political and military capability.

Saudi soft power, meanwhile, is taking a hit. According to one estimate, Saudi Arabia is thought to have spent $100 billion on forging linkages with intelligence and cultural agencies in the Muslim world. But following the storming of the Saudi embassy in Tehran, only four countries – Bahrain, Djibouti, Sudan and Somalia – rallied to break off diplomatic relations with Iran. The reputational costs incurred from the international backlash to Wahhabism have also stung Riyadh, crucially offering Pakistan a window topivot its relationship with Riyadh towards increased transparency and an unequivocal commitment to domestic national security, with the 20-point National Action Plan as a firm foundation for engagement.

While Pakistan has always had to pay a price for preserving the strategic relationship with Saudi Arabia, democrats in Pakistan’s parliament are increasingly resisting Riyadh’s pull. Now (two years into a major terrorist clean-up) is as a good a time as any for the interior ministry to implement a blanket ban on street rallies in favour of either Saudi Arabia or Iran.

Even as Pakistan navigates the narrow road between neutrality and non-intervention in the Middle East, it is inevitable that Saudi Arabia’s own internal undercurrents will spill over into Riyadh’s engagement with South Asia. The first effect will be that as Saudi Arabia’s perception of its own insecurity increases, so will its efforts to export software and hardware, given how closely the Kingdom relies on the propagation of the religious ideology and brand to legitimise its leadership, not just at home but more widely in the Muslim world.

This will make it all the more necessary for Pakistan to take measures, both diplomatic and domestic, that turn off the tap of Saudi funding to refugee camps and charity outfits across Pakistan. This will also mean monitoring finances entering Pakistan indirectly via Kuwait.

The second change that will be felt in the Pak-Saudi dynamic has to do with the Saudi-Iran power differential: as the gap closes, Saudi Arabia will look to its allies to compensate. In other words, as Riyadh exports its brand and coalesces capital, it will also look to import alliances and regional guarantees to offset any perceived strategic imbalance. The 35-nation military alliance against Daesh is exactly that: an attempt to artificially construct powerful new platforms from which to exercise Saudi leadership and demonstrate geopolitical hegemony.

The Hafar Al-Batin war games had a similar endgame: to help build the ‘inter-operability’ of the Saudi armed forces and their allies, so as to facilitate coordination and overcome multiple language barriers, military equipment and operating systems. This would seem to suggest that Saudi Arabia will be banking on more, rather than less, regional support in the coming months – ostensibly to counter American retrenchment in the Middle East – possibly including a deal with Pakistan that commits the Pakistani Army to a long-term training programme for the Saudi armed forces.

This dependency requirement also means that Saudi Arabia may start looking beyond a Pakistan that is attempting to exit Riyadh’s gravitational orbit; Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s upcoming visit to Riyadh may signal an important new Indo-Saudi axis of cooperation.

For Pakistan, this means that as the Middle East careens from conflict to crisis, visits by members of House Saud are likely to go up, not down. It also means that the next time Riyadh comes calling, Pakistan will have to sustain its newly asserted foreign policy independence beyond strategic ambiguity and disingenuous policymaking. A key way of doing this is by keeping its lawmakers briefed, rather than in the dark, on national security and foreign policy choices in the Middle East. Convening the National Security Committee, prior to the 13thOIC Summit scheduled to open in Turkey onApril 10, can also help create guidelines for engagement.

Climatic foreign policy shifts are difficult to choreograph, but when it comes to the Saudi relationship, it is especially important for Pakistan to layer foreign policy choices with nuance, and separate what it sees as ‘shared interests’ from ‘shared values’.

While a shrinking common denominator with Riyadh may be a good thing for Pakistan’s own battle against militancy and extremism, it will not necessarily bode well for stable geopolitics and will almost certainly be resisted by a still-powerful monarchy in Riyadh. Even without Saudi Arabia as a guarantor of regional stability, either in the Middle East or in South Asia, the kingdom will continue to look to fall back on Pakistan and other players to project power – hard and soft. Pakistan needs to decide if it will be there to catch it when it does.

The writer works for Jinnah Institute. Twitter: @fahdhumayun