No ‘nuclear’ string attached to 9th Review: IMF official
Discussions with the Pakistani authorities have exclusively focused on economic policies, says Esther Perez
By News Desk
March 20, 2023
ISLAMABAD: The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has rejected speculation that the lending institution had attached any conditions to Pakistan’s missile or nuclear program as part of the ninth review of the IMF-supported program, reports Geo News on Sunday.
Stating that there was “absolutely no truth” to any such insinuations, Esther Perez Luiz, the IMF resident representative, clarified that discussions with the Pakistani authorities have exclusively focused on economic policies to address the country’s economic and balance of payments issues.
-
Amanda Holden Finds The Bright Side With Nostalgic Move Amid ‘Britain’s Got Talent’ Crisis Rumors -
Strait Of Hormuz Turmoil: Gulf Shipping Crisis Raises Fears Of Global Food Price Shock -
Sarah J Maas Makes Exciting Announcement For ‘Acotar’ Series -
Teyana Taylor Makes Shocking Claim About 'One Battle After Another': 'Very, Very Real' -
Qatar Airways To Operate Relief Flights From Muscat And Riyadh For Stranded Travelers Amid Global Turmoil -
2026 Pro-Human AI Declaration: How Humanity Can Control Artificial Intelligence -
Lewis Hamilton Vows To 'put More Work In' As He Gears To Return For 2026 Formula 1 Season -
Sarah Ferguson Watches Beatrice, Eugenie Struggle For Parents: ‘She Could Finally Release It’ -
Father Takes Major Action Against Google Over Son’s Death -
Everything We Know About Michael Sheen’s 'You Told Us To Talk About The Weather' -
Jodie Sweetin Breaks Silence On Her Bond With Candace Cameron Bure: 'Not Gonna Hug' -
Indonesia Slams Meta Over Rising Disinformation And Online Gambling Content -
Rockstar Pulls GTA 6 From Store After Surprise Leak: Here’s Why -
Brooklyn Beckham Reacts Negatively To Birthday Tributes From David, Victoria -
Nicola Coughlan Makes Major Claim Over ‘plus Size’ Label -
Senate Prioritizes Housing As Crypto Bill Hits New Impasse, Stalling Trump’s ‘Clarity Act’ Agenda