LHC suspends arrest warrants for Imran, Fawad in ECP contempt case
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) Monday suspended the bailable arrest warrants of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf’s (PTI) top leaders — Imran Khan and Fawad Chaudhry — in the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) contempt case.
LHC’s three-member Rawalpindi bench — comprising Justice Chaudhry Abdul Aziz, Justice Sadaqat Ali Khan, and Justice Mirza Waqas Rauf — issued the verdict on a petition filed against the ECP’s decision.
The court ordered the election commission to continue the proceedings within its jurisdiction as the LHC would not interfere in the proceedings of the electoral body. The court said that the decision of the election commission can be challenged by any of the parties. After the ECP’s decision, the petitioners can approach the court, it added.
The election commission had last Tuesday issued bailable arrest warrants for the two PTI leaders in the case pertaining to “contemptuous” remarks against Chief Election Commissioner Sikandar Sultan Raja.
A four-member bench — comprising ECP members Nisar Ahmed Durrani, Shah Mohammad Jatoi, Babar Hasan Bharwana, and Justice (retd) Ikram Ullah Khan — issued the order following the non-appearance of the leaders in the case proceedings.
“Consequently, in the circumstances of the case, we have left with no alternative except to issue a bailable warrant of arrest against respondent in the sum of Rs50,000/- (fifty thousand) with two sureties in the like amount each,” the verdict issued by the ECP read. Last year, the top electoral body initiated contempt proceedings against the PTI leaders for allegedly using foul language against the chief election commissioner. It has served several notices on them, asking them to appear in person and explain their point of view.
However, the PTI leaders did not appear before the ECP and later challenged its powers to initiate contempt proceedings under Section 10 of the Election Act 2017 in different high courts. Section 10 of the election act states that the “election commission may exercise the same power as the high court to punish any person for contempt of court and the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003 (V of 2003), or any other law pertaining to contempt of court shall have effect accordingly[…]”
Earlier this year, the ECP filed a petition with the Supreme Court, seeking consolidation of all six petitions before one high court. In its decision, the top court said the ECP had been allowed to continue proceedings under Section 10 against the PTI leaders, but it barred the electoral body from giving final orders.
-
Nicola Peltz's Ex's Sister Reveals 'truth' About Actress Amid Brooklyn Beckham Drama -
Davos: Elon Musk’s Surprise Addition To The Schedule Draws Global Attention -
Why Kylie Jenner's Family Loves Timothée Chalamet -
World's Oldest Artwork: 68,000 Year-old Cave Paintings Discovered In Indonesia -
Brooklyn Beckham’s Family Feud Shows No Signs Of Healing Anytime Soon -
Spain Calls For EU Joint Army After Trump’s Declaration Of Greenland Deal -
Elon Musk Pokes Fun At Anthropic, Calls It 'misanthropic' -
Gwyneth Paltrow Opens Up About Coping With ‘anxiety’ -
New Study Links ‘binge-watching Addiction’ To Increased Social Isolation -
Jason Statham Reflects On Intenses Physical Demands Of Work -
Why Cancer Comes Back And How Scientists Believe It Can Be Stopped -
US To Exit WHO: A Seismic Shift In Global Health? -
Palace Staff Reveals Nothing Has Changed For ‘disgraced’ Andrew After Losing Titles -
How Did Taylor Swift Cope With ‘exhausting’ Sickness During Popular ‘Eras Tour’ -
Artists Launch ‘Stealing Isn’t Innovation’ Campaign Against AI Use -
Elon Musk’s XAI Grok Imagine Now Generates 10-second Videos With Sharper Quality: Here’s How