US Supreme Court lets New York enforce new gun restrictions
WASHINGTON: The US Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed New York to enforce a Democratic-backed gun control law adopted after the justices last year struck down the state’s strict firearms licensing regime in a landmark ruling that expanded gun rights.
The justices rejected a request by six members of the firearms rights group Gun Owners of America to throw out a lower court’s decision allowing the law to be enforced. US District Judge Glenn Suddaby in October blocked enforcement of much of the law but the Manhattan-based 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in December put that decision on hold while the state pursues an appeal.
The justices turned away a plea by the law’s challengers. The gun owners wanted the high court to lift a federal appeals court order that temporarily put on hold a lower court decision blocking portions of the law.
The appeals court hasn’t finished its review of the case, and justices are often reluctant to weigh in under those circumstances. The justices could still consider the case and the law more generally in the future.
New York lawmakers rewrote the state’s handgun laws over the summer after a June Supreme Court ruling invalidated New York’s old system for granting permits to carry handguns outside the home.
The ruling said that Americans have a right to carry firearms in public for self-defense, invalidating the New York law, which required people to show a specific need to get a license to carry a gun outside the home.
The ruling was a major expansion of gun rights nationwide and resulted in challenges to other, similar state laws. The new law New York passed in the wake of the ruling broadly expanded who can get a license to carry a handgun, but it increased training requirements for applicants and required them to provide more information including a list of their social media accounts.
Applicants for a license must also demonstrate “good moral character.” Beyond that, the law included a long list of “sensitive places” places where firearms are banned, among them: schools, playgrounds, places of worship, entertainment venues, places that serve alcohol and Times Square.
US District Judge Glenn Suddaby, however, declared multiple portions of the law unconstitutional and issued a preliminary injunction barring certain provisions’ enforcement. But the US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit had put that ruling on hold while it considers the case. Challengers to the law had asked the high court to step in and allow Suddaby’s ruling blocking parts of the law to go into effect while the case continues.
-
2026 Jobs Outlook: Global Unemployment Hits 4.9%, Decent Work Deficit Widens -
NHS Issues 'eight-week' Warning For Omeprazole Users -
Details Of Kate Middleton 44th Birthday Celebrations With Family Revealed -
Elon Musk Introduces Subscription Model For Tesla FSD In Strategic Move -
Prince Harry To 'soft Launch' Meghan Markle As They Test Return To Royal Life -
Meghan Markle 'strict Personal Conditions' For UK Trip Come To Light -
Kiefer Sutherland Detained For Allegedly Assaulting Ride-share Driver In Hollywood -
Is Hytale Worth Playing? Here’s Everything You Need To Know -
Google Photos Tests Battery-saving Backup Option -
China Defies Trump Tariffs As Trade Surplus Hits Record $1.2T In 2025 -
No Hopes Of Royal Reunion As King Charles Set To Dodge Prince Harry -
Taiwan Issues Arrest Warrant For OnePlus CEO Pete Lau -
Evan Peters Reveals What Brought Him Back To 'American Horror Story' -
Google Meet Adds Automatic Room Check-in On Mobile Devices. -
A New “living Drug” Offers Hope For Patients With Aggressive Blood Cancer -
US Formally Approves Nvidia H200 Chip Exports To China: What Conditions Are In Place?