SHC restrains private schools from collecting June, July fees in advance
The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Monday restrained the private schools from collecting advance fees of June and July fees collectively and directed them to issue tuition fee challans for each current month.
The court also directed parents to pay the tuition fee challans issued by the schools as per its order.
The high court was hearing a contempt of court application filed by parents against the non-implementation of the order that declared illegal increases in tuition fees by private educational institutions by over five percent from their last fee schedules.
Bushra Jabeen and other petitioners had filed the contempt application against private schools, the private schools director general and others for not implementing the court order. The counsel for the petitioners submitted that private schools were issuing tuition fee challans for June and July collectively in violation of the court order that tuition fees may not be received in advance.
The counsel of the private schools said that parents were not paying the tuition fees in the garb of calculations, and as a result schools were facing financial problems.
He said revised fee challans had been issued in compliance with court directions. He requested the court to direct the parents to pay the tuition fee. An SHC full bench, headed by Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, directed the private schools to issue tuition fee challans for only month of June and asked the parents to pay the tuition fee as per the revised challans issued under its directives.
The court directed the private schools’ administrations to not charge more than one month’s fee and recall the advance fee challans of July. The hearing was put off till May 20.
A full bench of the SHC had earlier declared that the provisions of Section 6 of the Sindh Private Educational Institution Ordinance and Rule 7(3) that restricted private educational institutions from increasing their fees by more than five percent did not suffer from any constitutional defect or legal infirmity and the same were intra vires to the constitution and the law.
-
Bruce Springsteen Makes Strong Political Statement -
Prince Harry Relationship With King Charles 'not Straightforward,' Says Expert -
Truth Behind Jennifer Lopez's 'rude' Glambot Moment Laid Bare -
Nicole Richie Still Loves This Makeup Trend From Her Teen Years -
Meghan Markle Plans To Hide Behind Kids Over Return To UK -
Dolly Parton Marks Major Milestone As State Governor Honors Her Legacy -
Karley Scott Collins Reacts To Rumours Of Her Dating Keith Urban -
Meghan Markle Sends Shockwaves With Promise Of Chaos: ‘Has The Power To Upset The Royals’ -
Jesy Nelson, Zion Foster Call It Quits Amid Twins' Heartbreaking Diagnosis: Source -
What King Charles Told Princess Diana In Letter Before Wedding? -
David Crosby Said This One Singer Had 'no Talent At All' -
Meghan Markle’s Return Risks Setting Off Something ‘exhausting’ And William, Kate Are Bracing -
Bruce Springsteen Reveals Singer He Finds To Be Greatest Rock And Roll Voice -
Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Ensures Teddy Bear Collection Reaches New Home -
Ben Affleck Recalls 'throwing Up' During 'Armageddon' Final Scene -
Kevin Costner Marks 71st Birthday With Decades-old Throwback Photos