SHC restrains private schools from collecting June, July fees in advance
The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Monday restrained the private schools from collecting advance fees of June and July fees collectively and directed them to issue tuition fee challans for each current month.
The court also directed parents to pay the tuition fee challans issued by the schools as per its order.
The high court was hearing a contempt of court application filed by parents against the non-implementation of the order that declared illegal increases in tuition fees by private educational institutions by over five percent from their last fee schedules.
Bushra Jabeen and other petitioners had filed the contempt application against private schools, the private schools director general and others for not implementing the court order. The counsel for the petitioners submitted that private schools were issuing tuition fee challans for June and July collectively in violation of the court order that tuition fees may not be received in advance.
The counsel of the private schools said that parents were not paying the tuition fees in the garb of calculations, and as a result schools were facing financial problems.
He said revised fee challans had been issued in compliance with court directions. He requested the court to direct the parents to pay the tuition fee. An SHC full bench, headed by Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, directed the private schools to issue tuition fee challans for only month of June and asked the parents to pay the tuition fee as per the revised challans issued under its directives.
The court directed the private schools’ administrations to not charge more than one month’s fee and recall the advance fee challans of July. The hearing was put off till May 20.
A full bench of the SHC had earlier declared that the provisions of Section 6 of the Sindh Private Educational Institution Ordinance and Rule 7(3) that restricted private educational institutions from increasing their fees by more than five percent did not suffer from any constitutional defect or legal infirmity and the same were intra vires to the constitution and the law.
-
Sarah Ferguson Considers Unique Surgical Approach To Seeking Forgiveness For Epstein Fiasco -
Prince Harry, Meghan Markle Face Fresh Scrutiny Over Christmas Family Photo -
Watch: Kate Middleton Promises An Extra Special Something For Together At Christmas -
Kim Kardashian Goes Incognito On Holiday Ski Trip, Fans Can’t Recognize Her -
King Charles Gives A History Lesson To Royal Fans Ahead Of Christmas Broadcast -
How King Charles Is Reacting To Abdication Rumours, Prince William's Succession Talks? -
Space Race Intensifies As Russia Plans Lunar Nuclear Power Plant By 2036 -
Italy Orders Meta To Suspend WhatsApp Terms Prohibiting Rival AI Chatbots -
Serena Williams Surprises Sister With Most Expensive Wedding Gift -
Kris Jenner Names Kardashian-Jenner Who Is The ‘hardest’ To Get Gifts For -
Should Meghan Markle, Prince Harry Return To The UK For Christmas? Royal Fans Give Verdict -
Prince Harry, Meghan Markle Emotional Moment With Injured Dog Revealed -
Scientist Find New Clue To Spot Mental Health Risk -
UFO Expert Makes Startling Revelation About Interaction With Aliens -
Prince Harry 'determined' To Secure Stable Future For Archie, Lilibet Away From Crown -
Trump Flew On Epstein Jet Eight Times In 90s, Prosecutor Email Claims