Bureaucratic reforms
Of the many ambitious good-government reforms being pursued by the PTI government, its attempted overhauling of the civil service may be its most difficult. The bureaucracy is one of the most entrenched, powerful groups in government that has usually managed to stymie meaningful change. Prime Minister Imran Khan set up the Task Force on Civil Service Reforms, chaired by Institutional Reforms and Austerity Adviser Dr Ishrat Husain, to begin the process of reforming this most hidebound of institutions. Based on its initial recommendations, it appears that the task force is mainly focusing on reducing political interference in bureaucratic appointments. Its main idea so far is to form a panel of officers who will shortlist names for a vacancy after which the prime minister and chief ministers will have to choose a candidate from that list. The hope is that this will reduce the leeway that elected leaders have to pick only their allies and introduce at least a modicum of merit to the process. As always, however, the success of this proposal will depend on implementation. A government could always constitute a panel that is made up only of their partisans or the prime minister could only choose those from the shortlist someone he is confident will do his bidding.
Just about every government in the past has attempted some measure of bureaucratic reform only to fall prey to inertia or to game the system for its own benefit. There is no reason to believe the PTI will be any different, as the controversy over the transfer of the Pakpatta DPO in Punjab showed. The Task Force on Civil Service Reforms has already come under some criticism since 13 of its 19 members come from either the Pakistan Administrative Service or the District Management Group while the 10 other occupational groups within the civil service has scant representation. This could lead to reforms that end up being skewed in favour of groups like the PAS which have an interest in perpetuating the status quo. The task force should also keep in mind that political interference is only one of many problems that plague the bureaucracy. The civil service is dictated more by seniority than merit and it focuses more on activity than end results. An efficient bureaucracy that is capable of helping the government implement its policy agenda without bias is needed but such a change will require a change in culture that cannot be transplanted through committees and task forces.
-
Jennifer Hudson Gets Candid About Kelly Clarkson Calling It Day From Her Show -
Shamed Andrew Was With Jeffrey Epstein Night Of Virginia Giuffre Assault -
Shamed Andrew’s Finances Predicted As King ‘will Not Leave Him Alone’ -
Bad Bunny Faces Major Rumour About Personal Life Ahead Of Super Bowl Performance -
Sarah Ferguson’s Links To Jeffrey Epstein Get More Entangled As Expert Talks Of A Testimony Call -
France Opens Probe Against Former Minister Lang After Epstein File Dump -
Last Part Of Lil Jon Statement On Son's Death Melts Hearts, Police Suggest Mental Health Issues -
Leonardo DiCaprio's Girlfriend Vittoria Ceretti Given 'greatest Honor Of Her Life' -
Beatrice, Eugenie’s Reaction Comes Out After Epstein Files Expose Their Personal Lives Even More -
Will Smith Couldn't Make This Dog Part Of His Family: Here's Why -
Kylie Jenner In Full Nesting Mode With Timothee Chalamet: ‘Pregnancy No Surprise Now’ -
Laura Dern Reflects On Being Rejected Due To Something She Can't Help -
HBO Axed Naomi Watts's 'Game Of Thrones' Sequel For This Reason -
King Charles' Sandringham Estate Gets 'public Safety Message' After Andrew Move -
Lewis Capaldi Sends Taylor Swift Sweet Message After 'Opalite' Video Role -
Brooklyn Beckham Plunges Victoria, David Beckham Into Marital Woes: ‘They’re Exhausted As It Seeps Into Marriage